Wednesday, June 9, 2021

A Silver Spade

photo credit

 A Silver Spade (1950) by Louisa Revell

Miss Julia Tyler was polite but firm--No, she couldn't come and teach Latin at a summer camp in Maine for extremely bright young ladies. It didn't matter how light the duties, how beautiful the location, or how good the pay. She was very sorry that Mrs. Turner had made a trip to Pennsylvania to try and persuade her, but Miss Tyler has remodeling to do in anticipation for a new addition to the family. Wait a minute...what did you say about anonymous letters? Come back here and sit down...

You see, Miss Julia Tyler has a thing about mysteries. She reads them--a lot. And, she's been mixed up in two murders previously and couldn't resist playing amateur detective. As soon as she hears that faculty at the camp have been receiving nasty anonymous letters, she decides that a few weeks teaching Latin at Camp Pirate Island is just what she needs to do. The remodeling can get down without her supervision. But once the murders start and there seems to be no end in sight, she begins to think she made a mistake.

The first death seems almost straight-forward. Captain Benesch was a blackmailer and it looks like one of his victims just had enough and decided to silence him. But who was being blackmailed and for what? Well--there's the late-night activities on the beach which may be covert Nazi-sympathizers. There's talk of a faculty member previously tried and found innocent of murder--but was she really innocent? There's also speculation that Mrs. or Mr. Turner may have hurried Mrs. Turner's aunt to her grave in order to inherit the camp. And one of the faculty might be in the States with false documentation. There's also stories of pirate treasure to be dug up and just who is the camp nurse keeping hidden in the isolation ward? 

When more deaths follow, it begins to look like there might be other motives beyond disposing of a blackmailer and tidying up loose ends. We have all kinds of clues--from heavy black gloves (in the middle of summer) to a Coke bottle stamped "Terre Haute, IN" to a smooth seashell-shaped object. And when we're ready for the wrap-up, we have confessions and semi-confessions and an elaborate theory involving two of the little girls. And, then a final twist to the whole kaleidoscope.

my copy


This was a great book for a couple of reasons. First (and best--to me, anyway), it is an interesting twist on the academic mystery. Instead of being set at a school or university, we have a bunch of highly intelligent campers learning Latin and Greek and Astronomy and music on an island off the Maine coast. I love academic mysteries and it's always fun to find one with an interesting or different setting. And, second, I figured it out! I knew who and I knew the basic reason why (though I wasn't completely sure of the details of the initial motivation for the first murder in the camp). This didn't detract from the story because I was wondering when our sleuths would figure it out.

The ending is done quite nicely too. If the reader doesn't spot the killer, then it's quite fun to see the various theories explained and then shot down until we get down to the final (correct) solution. 

John over at Pretty Sinister Books reviewed this one back in 2016 (and I've shamelessly stolen his posted cover photo--credited above--since my copy comes in an unadorned 4-in-1 mystery book club edition). Check out his review too.

First line: My great-niece Anne is going to have a baby, and after I got home from Louisville I was busy getting the house ready for him.

Oh, Miss Tyler, but they all do that. Didn't you know? The person who writes the anonymous letters always writes one to himself....Don't you read detective stories? My dear, you really should. The most relaxing things in the world. (Miss Randle; p. 34)

Murderers aren't easily discouraged, Sally. As soon as Miss Randle came out with what she said about seeing somebody in the woods--well, that was when that person made up his mind." (Miss Tyler; p. 127)

Last line: We walked on.

**************

Deaths = 5 (one shot; two poisoned; one stabbed; one hit on head)

Sunday, June 6, 2021

Hunt the Tortoise


 What's wrong with everybody? What's in the air? Canadian divers and treasure ships, ungrateful sons and anxious parents, voices that talk in the night about mortal terror, Frenchwomen who think that England and France should be one nation, lucky tortoises, husbands who are afraid of their wives talking to me in case they say what they shouldn't...Is that what one expects to find when one comes on a holiday? (Celia Kent; p. 66))  ~Hunt the Tortoise (1950) by E. X. (Elizabeth) Ferrars

It's been nine years since Celia Kent has been to the Hotel Bienvenu in La Marette on the French coast. The last time she was there, she wasn't alone and had been the closest she had ever come to complete happiness. But then the war came and took that happiness--and the man she loved--away from her. She has returned in order to lay the ghost to rest. But it's difficult to find the peacefulness needed to lay ghosts when the atmosphere seems so uneasy. She expected changes after the war but she didn't expect the tense atmosphere that seems to affect everyone from the elder Oliviers who own the hotel to their son and wife who now manage the hotel to mixed bag of guests staying at the hotel.

Celia wonders just what has destroyed the pleasant atmosphere of the hotel--it seems little changed from what she remembered (despite needing sections rebuilt after war damage). Is it the fact that Jacques Olivier seems to have more on his mind than his beautiful wife and running the hotel business? Or that his parents are displeased with the way he and his wife "manage" the hotel that represents their life's work and savings? Maybe it's the Armenian black marketeer who seems afraid of more than the French authorities. Is the stockbroker who has installed himself, wife, six children, and his lucky tortoise really what he seems to be? Or is his family vacation a cover for something more sinister? What about the "Swiss" guests who seem to live through each night in mortal terror? Or the diver who's in search of sunken treasure? And then there's that nice young Englishman who claims he was on a walking tour--but who goes on a walking tour toting twelve volumes of Proust? 

Celia is caught up in the middle of a whirlwind of lost jewels, smuggled "goods," missing guests, and, finally, murder. After an altercation with Jacques Olivier, Pierre Jamais (the diver) is found stabbed with a harpoon. At first, it seems that Jacques is the most likely suspect. But then everyone begins talking about a man called Patrice who was seen in the area of the quay shortly before the murder. But Celia doesn't know what to think. She aligns herself with Michael Butler (the nice young Englishman) even though she senses that he hasn't been completely honest with her on certain points. But they don't really work together in traditional detective duo fashion. Michael pursues his own line and Celia finds herself coming across bits and pieces of clues almost accidentally. It isn't until she shares her information with him in the final chapters that he sees who really was behind the killing--not only of Jamais, but additional murders which follow.

Ironically, Celia and Michael don't get to present the local police with a solution. The inspector and his men have been quietly working off-stage and have had their sights on the culprit all along. I think perhaps this is my main quibble with the book--if the officials are going to solve the case, then I would expect to see more of them in the story. But we don't. We have two encounters with the police. They question everyone about the events of the evening of the murder--but we only see the interview with Celia. And then later the inspector (or whatever he is--he gets no name, just a description: "the sallow-faced man in the crumpled suit") overhears a conversation between Celia and Michael and asks a few more questions. That's it.

Despite this quibble, I did enjoy this one more than other stand-alone novels that I've read by Ferrars. I've tended to like her series with Andrew Basnett, retired professor of botany, much better than her stand-alones. Hunt the Tortoise has a number of excellent points to recommend it. First off, the atmosphere--the hotel and the surrounding area make a great setting and Ferrars manages to emphasize the uneasy atmosphere by balancing it against the beautiful coastal setting. The mystery is well-plotted and gives the reader some surprises--even in the choice of victim/s.

Another thing I appreciated was the way that post-war life is portrayed. The effects of the war touch nearly everything in the story and they have more presence than has been evident in many of the mysteries I've read from the same time period--but it's all done without seeming to be overdone. Through conversation we are reminded of rationing in England and how the prices of everything in France has gone up. Descriptions of the destruction Germans (and, sadly, Allies) left behind them as the war ended are woven naturally into the narrative. The once fashionable Hotel Mistral is described as now shuttered with cracked walls, and peeling paint. "War had closed the Hotel Mistral and, without scarring it with bombs or gunfire, had left it a ruin."

The last thing I'd like to emphasize is the way Ferrars handles the relationship between Celia and Michael. In so many mysteries (and fiction in general), a couple meet up, get involved in and/or solve a mystery, and are falling into one another's arms with wedding bells in the near future by the last page. Ferrars ends this one far more realistically. There's a sense that these two might get together, but there's nothing definite about it. He's headed off to wrap up some loose ends on his official business and says "I--I might come back--in certain circumstances." But Celia says nothing. Then when he says it again a bit later, she nods and he just walks off. And Celia turns "back to the bay and [stands] there, trying to sort out a confusion of feelings." It's obvious that these two have a ways to go if anything romantic is going to happen. It's a very refreshing denouement for the relationship side of the story.

Overall, a very good read and a recommended start for someone looking to read a Ferrars stand-alone novel. 

[I own this story in the four-in-one volume by the Unicorn Mystery Book Club--pictured above right.]

Kate at Cross Examining Crime has also reviewed this one--we had very similar responses to the story.

First line: When the train stopped at La Marette, Celia Kent climbed down to the low platform and stood still, looking curiously around her....becoming aware of the warm fragrance of pine, tamarisk and rosemary in the air, she realised that a scent can startle any memory into life again, and bridge a lifetime of forgetfulness.

"As to that, in my opinion, people don't change" (Jacques Olivier) "Ah yes, they change. Their characters can be quite altered. They can be corrupted....I know what I'm talking about. I know the good can be destroyed by the evil." (Madame Olivier) [p. 28]

Every time he makes a deal on the stock exchange, he rubs her shell, and that, he says, makes the deal turn out a success. A valuable animal--I wish I had one like her, but I don't know how one tells a luck tortoise from an unlucky one. (Madame Olivier; p. 30)

Something about that look and the discovery that someone unknown was standing close behind her gave Celia a shock that felt almost like fear. she felt her skin prickle. It was as if something evil had come close to her. (p. 31)

I have stayed in London once and my husband knows it well. He was there as a student. He says it affected his ideas profoundly. But that was many years ago, when the world seemed a more hopeful place than it does now. The only fortunate people now are the indifferent ones, and even they need courage. (Madame Marton; p. 64)

I always talk too much. I can't help it. Sometimes I think I only feel real when I'm talking. (Madame Marton; p. 65)

...generally speaking, the farther south you get in any country, the less you should believe. (Michael Butler; p. 74)

We've all seen horrible things. I've seen things I shall never forget, but it's no good thinking about them. We all have to go on living...it's no good letting oneself get depressed. (Madame Tissier; p. 129)

The place [Hotel Mistral] is a ruin. It's always a mystery how such things happen, but if the soldiers of any nation are quartered in a big, empty house like that, they destroy it....The state of the place is something you'd hardly believe. Why grown men do such things is hard to understand." (Monsieur Olivier; p. 131)

Isn't it a good thing sometimes, however worried one may be about the future, to forget about it and hang coloured lights everywhere and dance. (Madame Marton; p. 144)

Last line: Genevieve was staggering along the terrace, happily shaking a bottle with a few pieces of gravel in it and smiling at everything she saw.

******************

Deaths = 4 (one stabbed with harpoon; three shot)

Saturday, June 5, 2021

May Pick of the Month

 


When I decided to renew my Pick of the Month Awards, I was amazed to find that it had been three years since I put together a monthly list of books read, stats, ratings, and overall My Reader's Block P.O.M. Award winner. So far, I'm sticking to the plan. I had participated in Kerrie's Pick of the Month meme which focused on mysteries, but it doesn't look like she's got that up and running. My plan is to focus on mysteries (since that's the bulk of what I read), but if there are non-mysteries worthy of a P.O.M. award then I will hand out two awards. So...let's see what I've been up to in May--which turned out to be an extremely productive reading month!

Total Books Read: 28
Total Pages: 5,957

Average Rating: 3.3 stars  
Top Rating: 4.5 stars 
Percentage by Female Authors: 44%
Percentage by Male Authors: 37%
Percentage by both Female & Male Authors: 19%
Percentage by US Authors: 67%

Percentage by non-US/non-British Authors:  8%
Percentage Mystery: 75
Percentage Fiction: 92%
Percentage written 2000+: 19%
Percentage of Rereads: 29%
Percentage Read for Challenges: 100% {It's eas
y to have every book count for a challenge when you sign up for as many as I do.}    
Number of Challenges fulfilled so far: 16 (62%)

Mysteries/Mystery-Related Reads:

The Trolley to Yesterday by John Bellairs (3.5 stars)
Murder in Mesopotamia by Agatha Christie (3.5 stars)
The Ultraviolet Widow by Frances Crane (3.5 stars)
The Z Murders by J. Jefferson Farjeon (3 stars)
Look Behind You, Lady by A. S. Fleischman (3.75 stars)
The Venetian Blonde by A. S. Fleischman (2.5 stars)
Who Buries the Dead by C. S. Harris (4.5 stars)
The Montmartre Investigation by Claude Izner (2.5 stars)
Innocent Blood by P. D. James (3.5 stars)
I'll Kill You Next! by Adam Knight (2 stars)
The Black Thumb by Constance & Gwenyth Little (2 stars)
Accent on Murder by Frances & Richard Lockridge (4 stars)
Murder by the Book by Frances & Richard Lockridge (4 stars)
Preach No More by Richard Lockridge (3 stars)
Think of Death by Frances & Richard Lockridge (3.5 stars)
With One Stone by Frances & Richard Lockridge (4 stars)
Theoretically Dead by Tinker Marks (2.5 stars)
The Haunted Attic by Margaret Sutton (3 stars)
The Rainbow Riddle by Margaret Sutton (3 stars)
The Sands of Windee by Arthur W. Upfield (4 stars)
The Clue of the New Pin by Edgar Wallace (4 stars)


Handing out the P.O.M. award isn't going to be difficult this month. Only one book, Who Buries the Dead by C. S. Harris, came in with a 4.5 rating. 




Harris's Regency-era historical mysteries are very enjoyable. She often weaves actual events into her stories and manages to give a great deal of information about the period without turning the books into info-dumps. The developing relationships are interesting and dynamic. My one complaint is she keeps killing off interesting characters--she can stop that any time now. If she hadn't done so again in this one, I probably would have given WBtD a full five stars. The mystery was well done and the development of the relationship between Devlin and his wife was handled well also. This is the tenth book in a series that really does need to be read in order.








People of the Book


 People of the Book (2008) by Geraldine Brooks

Synopsis (from the back of the book): Hanna Heath, an Australian rare book expert, has been offered the job of a lifetime: analysis and conservation of the famed Sarajevo Haggadah, rescued from Serb shelling during the Bosnian war. Priceless and beautiful, the book is one of the earliest Jewish volumes ever to be illuminated with images. When Hanna discovers a series of tiny artifacts in its ancient binding--an insect wing fragment, wine stains, salt crystals, a white hair--she begins to unlock the book's mysteries, ushering in its exquisitie and atmospheric past, from its salvation back to its creation through centuries of exile and war.

Well, from what you've told me, the book has survived the same human disaster over and over again, Think about it. You've got a society where people tolerate difference, like Spain in the Convivencia, and everything's humming along: creative, prosperous. Then somehow this fear, this hate, this need to demonize "the other"--it just sort of rears up and smashes the whole society. Inquisition, Nazis, extremist Serb nationalists...same old, same old. It seems to me the book at this point, bears witness to all that.

Brooks' novel was inspired by the true story of the Hebrew codex which has been repeatedly rescued throughout history--most recently during the Bosnian war. Using research on the Haggadah's history from various sources as well as details gleaned from the actual conservation of the book in December 2001, Brooks seamlessly weaves her own fictional interpretation of the details to bring the book's history to life. It was fascinating to follow the book on its journey--both through time and across Europe, from 1480 to 2002, from Spain to Italy to Bosnia. The fictional stories of the artifacts found in the binding were fascinating, but it was also heartbreaking to watch the same prejudices resurface over and over again. And to know that have done so again recently here in the United States. The fear of the other--the need to demonize those who don't look like us and to use them as scapegoats when things aren't going as well as we'd like. It seems to be firmly ingrained--particularly in white "Christians." 

I found the story of the book's history to be much more compelling than the story of Hanna which is told alongside the historical sections. That's not to say that Hanna's story isn't interesting. It just pales in comparison to the narrative of the book's journey and the glimpses we are given of those who struggled with persecution and who risked their lives to save this rare volume. 

First line: I might as well say, right from the jump: it wasn't my usual kind of job.

Last lines: He reached for me. This time, I didn't pull away.

Friday, June 4, 2021

The Ultraviolet Widow


 The Ultraviolet Widow
(1956) by Frances Crane

Pat and Jean Abbott are at it again. Off on vacation to Mexico where they want to sprawl in the sun, catch some fish, and go hunting, they land themselves in the middle of a mystery that has everything from a pale, luminous ghost to ancient fossils to buried treasure...oh, and of course...murder.

They encounter Mrs. Howe, a woman from their neighborhood back in California, and she invites them to Alamos. A quiet little town with quick access to the kind of hunting that Pat has been looking for. While there they are introduced to the Van Gilder family--Nora Howe's daughter Marta and son-in-law Rex Van Gilder as well as their house guest, Audrey Peters. Audrey is a wealthy widow and Rex Van Gilder has her lined up to be his next wife. Also in the household: Eileen Kerry, Rex's niece and ward; Dale Owen, a geologist who's sweet on Eileen; a dictatorial housekeeper by the name of Bessie, and Jack Quitos, Van Gilder's sinister air pilot.

The Van Gilder house comes complete with fossilized skeletons, a deep well leading to tunnels full of of fossils, and its very own ghost. But the ghost is very well-regulated and well-behaved. It appears rarely and when it does it always appears at a few minutes after midnight and just briefly at that. It's like it doesn't want to bother anyone. It appears at its appointed hour on the night Audrey Peters is sent to her death down the deep well. After the murder, when everything else is in an uproar, it appears at an odd time and everyone has to wonder if it has anything to do with the murder. Of course, if Pat and Jean hadn't been on the spot, nobody would have known it was murder. 

The Van Gilders and the local doctor are sure that the drunken woman just stumbled into the well and fell to her death. But Pat's quick eye soon picks up on the clues that indicate that Audrey had help into the well. When the police are convinced of foul play, they believe that only Marta, who was about to be ousted as Rex's wife, had a motive. But Audrey had a quarrel with Jack Quintos not long before. And maybe Audrey had changed her mind about marrying Rex after all. Audrey had also signed some kind of document which needed witnesses (a new will?)--but the envelope with the paper has disappeared. And maybe Bessie wasn't keen on her employers choice in a new wife (not that she cares much for Marta either)--in fact, maybe Bessie had hopes of getting Rex all for herself. 

The plot moves fast through a second attempted murder, the discovery of a historic treasure, and the secret of the ghost's odd appearance--ending in a flurry of burned evidence, an attempt on Pat's life, and a an old-fashioned shoot-out. But Pat and the local police finally get their man...or woman.

This was one of the strongest of the Pat and Jean Abbott series I've read. Not quite as humorous and/or light and breezy as the North books and Jean isn't as quick-witted as Pam North. But she's definitely better at staying out of tight places and is quite good at getting Pat out of difficult situations (such as a well that's being filled in--with him in it!). This particular outing sees the couple working together quite well as a team. The mystery isn't complicated and clever readers will spot what's really going on with all that fossil hunting fairly quickly. A good, solid read. ★★ and 1/2.

[Finished 5/31/21]

First line: It isn't everyone who gets to see a ghost, even in Alamos, Sonora, Mexico, where legend has them as plentiful as the handsome arches of the old Spanish-style palaces.

Last lines: I had never in my life seen Patrick shoot a tigre. In fact, I had never seen a tigre.

****************

Deaths = one pushed into well

Tuesday, June 1, 2021

June Calendar of Crime Reviews

 




You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

June Virtual Mount TBR Reviews

 




You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

June Mount TBR Reviews

 



You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

June Vintage Scattergories Reviews

 




You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Monday, May 31, 2021

Book Challenge by Erin 15.0

 



~First and foremost, have fun. Don't stress. No one is being judged, graded, or penalized. Even if you finish only one book the entire challenge, if you enjoy it and it's an accomplishment for you, then that's awesome.
~The challenge will run from JULY 1, 2021 to OCTOBER 31, 2021. No books started before 12 a.m. on July 1 or finished after 11:59 p.m. on October 31 will count. (We live in different time zones--follow according to your own time zone.)
~Each book must be at least 200 pages long. Audio books are fine too.
~Read one book for each category.
~For full details see Erin's page on Facebook (link above).

Book List
5 pts Freebie: Murder Underground by Mavis Doriel May (286 p.) [7/5/21]
Bonus Round: Evil Under the Sun by Agatha Christie (8/10/21)
10 pts First word of title starts with "A" (not "A" or "An"): After the Armistice Ball by Catriona McPherson (302 p.) [Also works as Debut] (7/6/21)
Bonus Round: After the Funeral [aka Funerals Are Fatal] by Agatha Christie
10 pts Debut Book: Murder Draws a Line by Willetta Ann Barber & R. F. Schabelitz (333 p) [7/15/21]
Bonus Round: Marion Lane & the Midnight Murder by Tess Amy Willberg
15 pts Book with To, Too, or Two in title: Two-Way Murder by E. C. R. Lorac (237 p) [7/9/21]
Bonus Round: One, Two, Buckle My Shoe [aka The Patriotic Murders] by Agatha Christie [8/17/21]
20 pts Book by a person of color: The Conjure-Man Dies by Rudolph Fisher (316 p) [7/3/21]
Bonus Round: Children of Blood & Bone by Tomi Adeyemi
20 pts Book with 500+ pages: Giant Mystery Reader by various [edited by Avon Books] (634 p) [7/4/21]
Bonus Round: Anna Karenina by Tolstoy
25 pts Book about a famous woman: The Illusion of Murder by Carol McCleary [about Nellie Bly] (483 p) [7/11/21]
Bonus Round: The Mystery of Mrs. Christie by Marie Benedict (8/18/21)
30 pts Book with color of the rainbow in title: The Red Right Hand by Joel Townsley Rogers (237 p) [7/10/21]
Bonus Round: A Beautiful Blue Death by Charles Finch (8/12/21)
30 pts Book with song title/lyrics in title: A Night to Remember by Walter Lord (Centenary Edition; 215 p) "A Night to Remember" song by Shalamar (7/14/21)
Bonus Round: Born to Run by Bruce Springsteen
35 pts Book with girl protagonist/author younger than 15: Trixie Belden & the Mystery Off Glen Road by Julie Campbell (13 yrs old; 282 p)/ [7/5/21]
Bonus Round: Prince Caspian by C. S. Lewis (8/21/21)

First Round Complete!


Sunday, May 30, 2021

The Black Thumb


 The Black Thumb (1942) by Constance & Gwenyth Little

When a wicker chair is chopped up one overheated night in the hospital's contagion ward, it's easy to blame it on Jason Caddock, a vague scarlet fever patient who isn't quite right in the head and who has a penchant for escaping from his room whenever the nurses' backs are turned. But when one of his fellow patients winds up dead--looking like Agnes Dana been mistaken for a wicker chair student nurse Norma Gale isn't sure that Caddock is the killer. A bit off he may be, but she never took him for the psycho-killer type. And then when Aggie's brother William (also in hospital for German measles) is killed while Caddock was firmly locked up, it becomes apparent that there is a killer stalking among the scarlet fever and measles patients. Norma just hopes he or she doesn't start in the nursing staff next.

In order to help Inspector Shaw and Detective Phipps find the culprit, she'll be trying to figure out why William had an artificial black thumb (and wouldn't let anyone even mention it); why pools of water kept appearing outside his door and seemed to terrify him so; why Aggie insists on singing "John Brown's Body" at all hours; who is the mysterious person heard pacing in the unoccupied room; and what does this all have to do with an an odd poem and an old still found in Aggie's basement. And where on earth can that little hatchet of Aunt Aggie's be hidden?

Norma spends her time reassuring patients that "nothing is wrong" and "you'll all be fine" (pay no attention to the other patients being carried out feet first with their entire body covered), alternating being scared out of her mind and hunting for clues, being bashed on the head, and trading what's supposed to be witty comments with Dr. James Lawrence.

I have to say that either this isn't the best of the Littles' work or I just wasn't in the right mood for this sort of mystery. I didn't find the motive compelling or well set-up. And the circumstances that cause Norma to realize who must be the culprit doesn't really appear as the "a-ha" moment that it should. I didn't find the "fun" romantic banter between Norm and James to be all that romantic or fun. It all seemed to fall a bit flat for me. Other than the fact that he's described as a tall, dark and handsome doctor, I just don't see what's so appealing about him (maybe that's all you needed in the 1940s). Nor are there any events in the narrative that shed any light on what she sees in him or he in her for that matter. There's no solid basis for the bantering that goes on (if that's what we want to call it).

Norma could have been a good amateur detective and, in fairness, did have a couple of good moments--mostly when she and Linda (fellow nurse and niece to the Danas) were investigating in the Danas' house. But mostly she's just being nervous in the hospital wing and running in and out of patients' rooms looking for an ax that isn't there. I just can't recommend this as a good place to start with the Littles books. Fortunately, they're all stand-alones, so you don't have to worry about what order you read them in. 


Oh--and a slight spoiler. If there was any real explanation for the black thumb, I totally missed it and would appreciate someone telling me. Otherwise--what the heck?

First line: Heat pressed in through the high screened windows like damp wool and lay against my throat and face with an unpleasant smothering effect.

Last lines: "I'll let Louise marry that other James Lawrence--the one she's engaged to--and you go ahead and do what you please with me. I wouldn't want to let your mother down."

***********

Deaths = two axed to death


Friday, May 28, 2021

Murderess Ink: The Better Half of the Mystery (mini-review)


 Murderess Ink: The Better Half of the Mystery (1979) by Dilys Winn

A companion book to Murder Ink, which featured mysteries of all sorts, this volume focused exclusively on the feminine side of the genre: victims/sleuths/culprits/authors. I enjoyed the articles which highlight authors such as Dorothy L. Sayers, Margery Allingham, Josephine Tey, and Ruth Rendell (among others). And I also appreciated that a great number of the pieces were written by detective novelists themselves. Less enjoyable were some of the pieces that were written as if one were in the midst of one mystery or another or which framed ordinary events (such as a luncheon among mystery writers) as mysterious or top-secret affairs. These bits seemed either forced or too coy (and sometimes both). Coming to the book decades after it was written probably didn't help--some of it seems very dated. But there is still a great deal of interesting information and I even managed to glean a few more titles to add to my always-growing "To Be Found" list. ★★



Thursday, May 27, 2021

Murder in Mesopotamia


 Murder in Mesopotamia (1936) ~Agatha Christie

Nurse Amy Leatheran is sent look after the wife of a prominent archaeologist on a dig in Iraq. Ostensibly, she is there because Louise Leidner is run-down and nervy. But she finds that her charge is scared for her life. Over a period of years, Louise has received threatening letters from a husband she thought was dead. Each time she became close to a man, a new letter would arrive--threating her with death if she ever became the wife of anyone besides Frederick Bosner. When she fell in love with Dr. Leidner and decided to marry him, no letter arrived and she thought that either Bosner had truly died...or, if it was a nasty practical joke, that the practical joker had tired of their game. But then another arrives saying that she has disobeyed and that now she must die. 

The Leidners escape to the Middle East and again everything is quiet on the letter front for a good while. Now, however, the campaign has begun again and the most recent letter was hand delivered. There have also been mysterious faces and strange tapping sounds at Louise's window and she is sure that Bosner has arrived in Iraq. When Nurse Leatheran sees the letters, she think (as she realizes Dr. Leidner does) that, for whatever reason, Louise has sent the letters to herself because the handwriting looks very like a more cramped version of the woman's own. Whether it's because a very real fear has turned her brain or because the woman is bored and needs to dramatize herself, Nurse Leatheran isn't sure.

Both Dr. Leidner and Nurse Leatheran are prove wrong though when one afternoon Louise goes to her room for a nap and winds up bludgeoned to death. The difficulty is no stranger entered the archaeologist's compound during the relevant time and there is a mere ten minute window when the killer would have been able to get to her room without passing someone in the main area. Louise's room has one door and the windows were shut--and have bars which would have prevented entry in any case. it is a definite puzzle for the local police. Fortunately, Hercule Poirot is passing through the area on his way home from Syria and it isn't long before the famous detective solve the crime (with assistance from our medical narrator).

I primarily listened to this through our library's connection with Hoopla (though I do own hard copies of it) so I could "read" this while I worked and Anna Massey does a fine job with the narration. It had been a very long time since I first read this (back in the 1980s) although I have more recently watched the filmed version with David Suchet. I couldn't remember how closely the Suchet episode followed the book (and now I think I need to re-watch because with my sieve-like memory I still don't know...).

While I think the explanation of the first murder is a little bit extraordinary and the ultimate identity of the culprit is somewhat unbelievable--for reasons that can't be explained without spoiling*, the book overall is quite entertaining. The setting is good and I quite enjoyed Nurse Leatheran as our narrator. Since she is a complete outsider, we are encouraged to trust her observations, much as we would Hastings, and it was interesting to get a feminine perspective on the investigations of Poirot. Of course, it would have been even more interesting if she had turned out to be one of the Bosners in drag (as Poirot suggests as a possibility at one point)...but having a narrator turn out to be the culprit is a trick one should probably only use once and Christie had already pulled that one out of her bag of tricks. 

Christie fooled me for a good while and I had my sights set on the wrong culprit...until the last really big clue. What tripped me up was the real motive, but I don't blame myself for that. Since the ultimate identity is somewhat unbelievable for spoilerish reasons--and I would not have dreamed of the spoilerish reason--it's not a surprise that I didn't spot the real motive. ★★ and 1/2.

*If you really must know, highlight the apparently blank area: I find it difficult to believe that Louise could have remarried her first husband (under the name of Leidner) without realizing what she had done. I don't see how he could have changed that much that she wouldn't at least feel like there was something familiar about him.

First line (forward by Dr. Reilly--who gave the case to Nurse Leatheran): The events of this


narrative took place some four years ago.

First line (Ch. 1 forward): In the hall of the Tigris Palace Hotel in Baghdad a hospital nurse was finishing a letter.

First line (of Amy Leatheran's account): I don't pretend to be an author or to know anything about writing.

Last lines: Oh, dear, it's quite true what Dr. Reilly said. How does one stop writing? If I could find a really good telling phrase. I must ask Dr. Reilly for some Arab one. Like the one M. Poirot used. In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate...Something like that.

************

Deaths = 2 (one hit on head; one poisoned)

Tuesday, May 25, 2021

Who Buries the Dead (spoilerish)


 Who Buries the Dead (2015) by C. S. Harris

The year is  1813 and it is late at night in London. On a lonely path that leads to an edifice known as Bloody Bridge, a man by the name of Stanley Preston is found brutally murdered. His head had been cut off and displayed on the bridge. But why? And what was Preston, a wealthy man with humble roots and vaulting ambition doing in such a place that late at  night. When Sir Henry Lovejoy, Bow Street Magistrate, asks Sebastian St. Cyr, Lord Devlin to help investigate, Devlin discovers a lead strap near the bridge. It is inscribed with the words "King Charles, 1648." Does this reference to the Stuarts mean there is a political aspect to the murder? And does the fact that Preston had a collection of the heads of famous people (Oliver Cromwell, for one) have anything to do with the manner of his death?

Meanwhile at St. George's Chapel, Windsor, the vault containing Henry VIII and Jane Seymour had been opened and the workmen were surprised to find a third coffin. According to the lead strapping, it contained King Charles I. And the king's head is now missing. Then, a doctor who was acquainted with Preston is also killed and beheaded. Is there a madman loose with an obsession with heads or beheadings? What possible motive could there be for killing both men in such a brutal way? 

Then Devlin learns that his former Colonel--now Lord Oliphant, a man Devlin holds responsible for the brutal murder of nuns and orphans in Spain, is back in London after serving a stint as a Governor in Jamaica. Why was Oliphant recalled and what exactly was his connection to the dead men when they all were in Jamaica? When someone begins taking potshots at Devlin and his family, he has to wonder if he's making the killer uncomfortable or if Oliphant is just trying to tidy up any loose ends from his past. 

Along the way, Devlin encounters a rather insightful spinster by the name of Jane Austen. She marks some very adroit observations that help the noble investigator look at events from a slightly different angle. She doesn't solve the mystery for him, but she does shine a light on certain facts.

I would happily have given this installment five stars save for one thing. I do really get tired of authors killing off interesting characters. Harris has already killed off Russell Yates, the man who married and gave Sebastian's former lover Kat Boleyn protection from Lord Jarvis. Yates had a history of piracy and provided Sebastian with a source of information he would not normally have access to. And now we've decided to kill off Jamie Knox, the mysterious man who looked enough like Devlin to be his brother...and probably was (or at least half-brother). I had hoped we would eventually have a book that would explore that possibility more thoroughly and the interactions between the two would have been very good indeed in such an exploration. But now, if Devlin does wind up finding out the truth behind their similar looks, he will do so alone and I think the situation will be robbed of some of its impact. I can understand that we have a single hero in the novels--Devlin, but if Knox had died just after a momentous revelation of any sort, that would have been more powerful.

On the plus side, I was very glad to see Devlin get a bit of redemption in the final scenes. In general, when the killers in these novels put anyone (beyond their initial, intended victims) in danger or Devlin's involvement in the investigation seems to focus the killer's sights on additional victims, Devlin is too late to save them. This time, he and Tom are able to mount an effective rescue of a woman and her son--who have been used by the killer as bait to trap Devlin. I'm also appreciative that a way was found to deal out justice to Oliphant--of a type that seems particularly appropriate to the kind of man he is. I did want him to be the murderer...but this works just as well.

It is always a pleasure to see Harris accurately use real people and events (with just a tad of poetic license) in her stories. It was especially pleasing to run across Jane Austen and her family in Who Buries the Dead. Davina Porter's reading of the audio novel gave voice to an Austen full of wit and insight such as we would expect from the author of Pride & Prejudice.

The mystery is very well done in this one. Plenty of red herrings and some nice twists on the clues that lead down unexpected paths. I also enjoyed the further developments in Devlin and Hero's relationship. Whether such an equal partnership would really have existed in Regency England is questionable, but it is very nice to see them love and respect one another's strengths and gifts. (If Harris kills off Hero in some future installment, I'll not forgive her) A very strong entry in the series ★★★★ and 1/2.

First line: They called it Bloody Bridge.

Last line: "I want you," he said his throat tight with emotion as a gust of wind shuddered the trees overhead and sent a scattering of leaves spinning down to lie pale and shriveled against the cold dark earth.

****************

Deaths =  6 (two stabbed; one hit on head; two shot; one drowned)

Sunday, May 23, 2021

Think of Death


 Think of Death (1947) by Frances & Richard Lockridge

This is the first Lockridge book to feature Captain Heimrich as the sole lead investigator. He also appears in Murder Out of Turn, but Bill Weigand (who is on vacation in the country) works alongside of him and he has a cameo appearance in Death of a Tall Man. However, here the focus is still not primarily on Heimrich and his investigation. The real protagonist of the story is Marty (Martin) Brooks and the events are told from his point of view.

Brooks has just recently returned to work at his law firm after having served as a major in the OSS during World War II. He is sent by his office to the home of Freddy Upton, who happens to be the second husband of his ex-wife Ann, to advise and finalize a contract for an up-coming musical production. Upton has been a highly successful producer of theatrical works and regularly seeks backing from "angels."

From the moment he meets Upton, the major (with his war service instincts on the alert) senses that his client is over-playing his hearty host role. He's just not sure why. And when the second party involved in the contract must delay his arrival until the next morning and Upton insists that Brooks spend the night--implying that to say no would have more meaning than it should. He definitely thinks something is up. But then he watches Upton behave in the same ways to nearly everyone in the house--insisting that afternoon visitors stay to dinner (who obviously don't want to) and being overly attentive to Ann's young cousin, Doris. There is also a certain tension in the air that Brooks can't identify with any particular person. The major feels very much as if he had walked in on the second act of a play and missed vital pieces of information given in the first act.

When Upton is discovered the next morning--by Marty and Ann--lying over rocks in the brook and dead from a blow to the head, circumstances soon reveal that someone very much wants Ann...and possibly Marty too...to be arrested for murder. A forged note brought Marty to the spot. A note purportedly from Ann asking for a meeting and a note that has since disappeared. Captain Heimrich appears on the scene and Marty must decide how he's going to play it. Tell the inspector the whole truth and look like a liar because there is no note? Or tell a slightly revised version of why he was on the path near the brook and be made a liar if the the note reappears? No matter how he plays it, it's going to look bad for himself, and more importantly bad for Ann.

Once he makes his decision, he's on a race against Heimrich and the murderer to find evidence that someone besides Ann (and a certain major) had a motive and opportunity to kill Upton. A second murder follows Upton's death and things look even blacker for Ann. But then Marty remembers bits and pieces of conversations and things begin to add up...but will his calculations be complete before Heimrich decides the case against Ann is strong enough for an arrest?

I think the Lockridges were still trying to figure out what they wanted to do (of if they wanted do anything) with Heimrich. I don't think they had quite settled on his overall manner of investigation and were playing with the more suspense-heavy mystery. As an aside, I have to say that I'm not as big a fan of the suspense novels--either those done by them both or those written later by Richard alone. I don't think suspense is a strength for either of the Lockridges. This book strikes a bit of a balance between heroine-in-danger suspense and the straight mystery novel. The straight mystery elements are strong enough that they carry the book and allow me to give it a slightly higher than average rating.

It also helped that I liked Marty very much and appreciated his motives in trying to play detective. Having already read later Heimrich novels, it was a bit frustrating, however, to see the good captain sidelined, as it were. I'm sure it would have been a different reading experience had I read the books in publication order--but the earliest Heimrich novels (both this and I Want to Go Home) were not as easy to find. Overall, this is a very nicely plotted mystery. I think perhaps a few more solid motives to throw around as red herrings would have been good. If you accept the premise that Marty and Ann didn't do it (and the nice young man and the nice young woman generally don't in the Lockridge books--so this is no great spoiler), then there aren't many well-defined motives hanging about. The Lockridges did know how to write a pleasantly interesting book, though. ★★ and 1/2.

First line: He had expected the house to be larger.

But you stubbornly built pictures in your mind, and you built them around things you knew. You did not necessarily build them around observed facts, or logical reasoning. (p 7)

It was odd, Martin thought, how vividly you remember things even after they had ceased to have any importance. (p. 10)

He had had enough of excitements during a marriage and a war; excitements which, he told himself, were alien to him, who wanted only ordinary things to happen--who wanted a little law, a little comfort and above all nothing which could not be foreseen. (p. 21)

No good policeman rejects the obvious because it is the obvious, and much less because an emotionally involved man assures him that the obvious is out of character. (p. 93)

This was murder. This was death at its most unquiet. This was something which everyone who could read would have, would demand, a part in. A light had been turned on them from which there was no escape. (pp. 152-3)

Last line: She did not finish because, for the moment they looked at each other, during the moment before they moved, there was no longer anything of any importance which needed saying.

***************

Deaths = 2 hit on head