You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!
Click here to enterMystery Lover...but overall a very eclectic reader. Will read everything from the classics to historical fiction. Biography to essays. Not into horror or much into YA. If you would like me to review a book, then please see my stated review policy BEFORE emailing me. Please Note: This is a book blog. It is not a platform for advertising. Please do NOT contact me to ask that I promote your NON-book websites or products. Thank you.
A mammoth short story collection with murder and mayhem aplenty--but quite a few with a horror/fantasy bent to them. We have everything from supernatural creatures (like the Wendigo of the first story to a harpy-like monster later in the book) to killer teddy bears to unnatural children. There are a few more straight-forward murder mysteries, but in most of these the killer doesn't have to surrender to justice (at least not within the pages of the story). While the stories are, for the most part, well-written, I do prefer murderers to get their just desserts. Stories that just didn't do much for me: "Funeral," "Into the Blue," "Mr. Happy Head," and "The Dualists." The last of these seemed to be gruesome just for the sake of being gruesome. A few I've read before, so while good, they did not have quite the impact of first reading: "Dr. Hyde, Detective, & the White Pillars Murder," "The Traveller's Story of a Terribly Strange Bed," and "The Trial for Murder." The best of the bunch: "The Rector of Veilbye," "The Thing Invisible," "Pigeons from Hell," and "In the Dark." I also really like Oscar Wilde's tale of Lord Arthur Savile's attempts at murder (because I adore Oscar Wilde) and Wilde's send-up of the murder story. In true Wilde fashion he turns everything on its head. ★★★ and 1/2 for the collection.
Just a small personal rant...why on earth can we not name all of our characters? Some of these stories had plenty of corpses and the author either gave names to some but not all or gave none of them names. Help a girl out here--we need those names for the Medical Examiner's Challenge.
"The Wendigo Goes Home" by Sara Dobie Bauer: The Wendigo (disguised as one Cleve Packer) hasn't dined on flesh for a while. This one only eats people who are close to death anyway. He always knows who...he can smell death upon them. (one devoured by the Wendigo)
"The Death of Halpin Frayser" by Ambrose Bierce: A story of madness, murder, and maybe a ghost out in the wilds of California. (one throat cut; one strangled)
"The Moonlit Road" by Ambrose Bierce: Another story of madness & murder....and a solution given through the transcription of a medium. And a depressing solution it is. (one strangled)
"The Rector of Veilbye" by Steen Steensen Blicher: Based on a real 17th C murder case--a rector is accused and convicted of murdering his servant, but the story is a little more complicated than that. (one hanged; one beheaded; one of a stroke)
"Funeral" by Michael Cebula: A revenge story, pure and simple. And definitely not my cup of tea. (And nobody has a name, so none of the deaths count.)
"Into the Blue" by Carolyn Charron: Another story that's not for me--it crosses one of my "I don't do these kind of stories" lines (and I can't tell you which one without spoiling the ending). Well-written, but not gonna be one of my favorites. (And, of course, no names, so I can't count it for the M.E. Challenge either)
"Dr. Hyde, Detective, & the White Pillars Murder" by G. K. Chesterton: The only appearance of this particular detective. Dr. Hyde and his two proteges (John Brandon & Walter Weir) are asked investigate the death of Melchior Morse. Strangely, Dr. Hyde leaves the investigation to the two fledgling detectives. There are only two physical clues--a half-footprint and a cigar stump. In the end, the star pupils discover a very surprising murderer and decide that perhaps detecting isn't for them after all. (one neck broken)
"Don't you feel by this time that it's the atmosphere of the whole place? It's not a bit like those delightful detective stories. In a detective story all the people in the house are gaping imbeciles, who can't understand anything, and in the midst stands the brilliant sleuth who understands everything. Here am I standing in the midst, a brilliant sleuth, and I believe, on my soul, I'm the only person in the house who doesn't know all about the crime." (Walter Weir)
You can build everything on the trifle except the truth. (Weir)
We're so sure that people mean what we mean, that we can't believe they mean what they say. (Weir)
"The Traveller's Story of a Terribly Strange Bed" by Wilkie Collins: A famous story included in many anthologies. A gambler has a night of huge winnings and much celebration. So much celebration that he's convinced to spend the night in the gaming house rather than take his winnings out into the street in his inebriated state. But the gaming house master doesn't intend that the gambler will leave the house at all.
"Who Killed Zebedee?" by Wilkie Collins: A young policeman has his first and last case of murder--that of a young bridegroom. His bride insists that she must have stabbed him in her sleep...but did she? (one stabbed)
"The Trial for Murder" by Charles Dickens: A supernatural story of justice served. The ghost of a murdered man appears repeatedly to the foreman of the jury deliberating over the trial of his murderer. He makes every effort to ensure a verdict of guilty will be entered. (Guess what--no names!)
"The Problem of Dead Wood Hall" by Dick Donovan: Our unnamed detective sets out to prove that two men were murdered by the same unknown poison--two years apart. I am not a huge fan of open-ended mystery stories. The detective solves the mystery (we think)--but a jury of twelve men good and true don't agree.(two poisoned)
"Mr. Happy Head" by James Dorr: Another that is not my cup of tea. We get to be all up and in the culprit's thoughts. Not a pleasant place to be. I'm not at all sure how many deaths "Mr. Happy Head" is responsible for....Nor am I certain what happens to him at the end. (No names here either...)
"The Brazilian Cat" by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle: A man plans to do away with the heir that stands between himself and a fortune. The plot involves a very unusual murder method--but will it succeed? [one attacked by a large cat; one natural]
"Nineteen Sixty-Five Ford Falcon" by Tim Foley: A haunted car, a supposed suicide pact...and the truth. (Two drowned)
"Mama Said" by Steven Thor Gunnin: Our narrator has to have a psychological exam to see if he's competent to stand trial. The examiner is going to regret that...briefly. (two stabbed)
"Six Aspects of Cath Baduma" by Kate Heartfield: Not really a mystery. A fantasy battle. (one stabbed--along with a score more unnamed)
"The House Among the Laurels" by William Hope Hodgson: Carnacki, the supernatural investigator, takes on the evil forces haunting the house his friend has recently inherited. At first it looks like it might truly be spirits of one sort or another...but then Carnacki develops the photographs he took...
"The Thing Invisible" by William Hope Hodgson: Carnacki investigates the case of a butler stabbed in front of witnesses. The witness are convinced that either the dagger has a mind of its own or an invisible agent has employed it. Carnacki is almost convinced that the supernatural is involved...and then he notices something odd in a photograph. (one natural)
"Freedom Is Not Free" by David M. Hoenig: What happens when the clones rise up against the "Primes"? It's not pretty...and the investigating officer finds himself in the middle in a way he could never have imagined. (two stabbed; two shot; one hit on head)
"Mademoiselle de Scuderi" by E. T. A. Hoffman: 17th C Paris during the reign of Louis XIV. The poiet Mademoiselle de Scuderi becomes entangled in a series of thefts and murders. She sets out to clear an apprentice and his daughter of suspicion. (two poisoned; two beheaded; one burned; one stabbed)
"How to Build a Mass-Murderer" by Liam Hogan: What if the building blocks for mass murder were scripted in the DNA. How would a government defend against "DNA terrorism"? A very short short story--and yet manages to be a bit confusing for over half of it.
"Pigeons from Hell" by Robert E. Howard: When two travelers decide to spend the night in an abandoned Southern mansion, they get more than they bargained for. Death and revenge are perched in the house...just like the pigeons perched on the eaves. (four hit on head with axe; one poisoned; one shot)
"The Two-Out-of-Three Rule" by Patrick J. Hurley: Kyle and his friends are gaming nerds--the girls just don't go for them. Until Kyle finds the perfect girl. Elaina is beautiful, smart, and loves gaming. And she wants to be all his. There's just one little catch... (one eaten)
"The Well" by W. W. Jacobs: A man murders a blackmailing hanger-on who might spoil his chances at matrimonial bliss. But he learns (the hard way) that you really shouldn't hide the body on your own property. And especially not somewhere that your lady-love might lose a precious bracelet. (two drowned)
"In the Penal Colony" by Franz Kafka: In the penal colony punishment is given a brutal twist. (one stabbed)
"Getting Shot in the Face Still Stings" by Michelle Ann King: Gangsters really don't like it when someone snatches their takings...even if the one doing the snatching is an immortal goddess/demon who comes back every time they kill her. (one beaten to death; one stabbed)
"The Return of Imray" by Rudyard Kipling: Slightly supernatural tale of Imray, a man in British India, who goes missing. He unexpectedly returns in the most grisly manor. (one throat cut; one poisoned)
"Less Than Katherine" by Claude Lalumiere: The narrator's daughter, the Katherine of the title, discovers a stone knife while the family is on vacation. It soon takes possession of her...leaving a trail of murder in its wake. Interesting twist at the end. (eight stabbed)
"Shared Losses" by Gerri Leen: A woman takes revenge when her ex takes up with another woman and her reasons are, shall we say, a bit different.... (Yep--no names.)
"The Hound" by H. P. Lovecraft: Two friends are bored with normal life and decide to dabble in the dark arts and make a collection of strange and unwholesome items. When they uncover a cursed amulet and add it to their collection, they release a diabolical force. (one mauled to death)
"From Beyond" by H. P. Lovecraft: A mad scientist does experiments to open himself up to all the senses that he believes men used to have...he exposes his servants and his friend (though the scientist certainly doesn't treat him as such) to previously unseen terrors. (one vaporized; one apoplexy)
"Drive Safe" by K. A. Mielke: A young woman soon regrets making her boyfriend stop to help an apparently helpless woman. (one eaten; one vaporized)
"In the Dark" by Edith Nesbit: A tale of three men. Our narrator, Winston, who is worried about his friend Haldane. Haldane is a man in distress--caused by Visger. Visger has been a tattletale who always tells the truth--even when it seems impossible for him to know it--and the other two have hated him for it ever since they were boys together. Finally, Visger tells one truth too many. (one strangled; one heart attack; one poisoned)
"The Cask of Amontillado" by Edgar Allan Poe: Poe's classic about a man who takes an extraordinary revenge for an unspecified insult. (one walled up)
"The Azure Ring" by Arthur B. Reeve: Professor Craig Kennedy is out to prove whether District Attorney Whitney is correct in his suspicion that a pair of young lovers have been murdered--even though there's no trace of violence or poison. The coroner thinks it was an accident of some sort, but there isn't even evidence of that. [three poisoned]
"Redux" by Alexandra Camille Renwick: Take Groundhog Day and add murder and what you'll get is "Redux." A nice little SF twist on repeat murder. (one shot)
"The First Seven Deaths of Mildred Orly" by Fred Senese: Mildred Orly hates the way she looks and decides she can't live looking like that. When she commits suicide she finds out she has the power to do something about the way she looks.... (two poisoned; one shot; one stabbed; one hanged; one heart failure)
"Markheim" by Robert Louis Stevenson: A petty thief turns murderer on Christmas Day and finds himself in a moral struggle when it seems a second murder may be necessary. (one stabbed)
"The Dualitists" by Bram Stoker: Two young boys are given identical knives as presents--and after learning the destructive power of identical weapons they go on a terrible rampage. (two shot; two hit on the head)
"The Burial of the Rats" by Bram Stoker: A man is trapped in the catacombs under Paris, pursued by people who live down there among the rats.
"Mister Ted" by Donald Jacob Uitvlugt: Mister Ted is a stuffed bear. And he will do anything for his little girl Sophie. Anything. (one suffocated; two stabbed)
"Cheese" by Ethel Lina White: A young woman fresh up from the country is set as bait to catch a nasty killer. If she survives, she'll earn a 500 pound reward....(one strangled)
"Corpses Removed, No Questions Asked" by Dean H. Wild: When a woman uses a Lil Slugger bat in a fit of rage and kills her errant husband, she wonders, "Now what do I do with him." She finds out the answer when the doorbell rings. (four hit on head)
"Lord Arthur Savile's Crime: A Study of Duty" by Oscar Wilde: Lord Arthur Savile attends a party where a man reads palms as a party trick. When he looks at Lord Arthur's hand, he turns pale and only reveals what he sees when the gentleman insists. Murder--Lord Arthur will commit murder. And--seeing as Lord Arthur is engaged to marry, it is, of course, his duty to get the distasteful event out of the way before the nuptials. Never did a man find it so difficult to commit one simple murder. (one natural; one drowned)
"Fragments of Me" by Nemma Wollenfang: A young woman with multiple personality disorder has one particularly nasty personality struggling to be primary. (one strangled)
First line (1st story: Cleve Packer prided himself on eating only people who were about to die.
Last lines (last story): Today I am Billy, but tomorrow who knows? It could be one of seven fragments of me.
London, 1816: We open with Sebastian St. Cyr, Lord Devlin's nephew Bayard Wilcox awakening from a drunken stupor to find his friend Marcus Toole's body burning up in the bonfire they had built as part of a raucous night. Despite the rift between his uncle and his mother, his first thought is to run to Devlin for help. Bayard claims that he and Marcus got rip-roaring drunk (as they are wont to do--usually with a larger group of friends) and thought it would be hilarious to build a bonfire up on Primrose Hill where people who believe in the druidic practices like to hold little get-togethers. He wandered off into the woods to relieve himself and the next thing he knew he was waking up to a strange smell coming from the clearing where he'd left Marcus and the fire.
While Devlin is waiting for Sir Henry Lovejoy and his Bow Street Runners to arrive, he searches the area and finds a wooden carving shaped like a wolf--on each flank is a Celtic knot. Was this part of some Celtic rite gone wrong? Or is there more to it? When Devlin learns that another of Bayard's friends was recently killed--stabbed and thrown into the river--he has to wonder if the men themselves hold the reason for the killings. In fact, he has to wonder if Bayard is telling him the whole truth or might be responsible himself. His investigation shows him that Bayard and his friends were not nice men. They picked fights, harassed, and destroyed the property of the powerless. All of the men were privileged sons of the wealthy and were never properly brought to account for their actions. Has someone decided to take justice into their own hands?
More deaths follow--including two of the groups victims--and one of the original six men has disappeared altogether. Now Devlin has to wonder if there is more than one killer at work. The crown (for which read Jarvis, the real power behind the throne) wants someone, anyone arrested and hung for the murders NOW. Preferably one of the riff-raff who are protesting the government. Devlin will have to work quickly if he doesn't want to see an innocent man (or men) hang.
I don't know why I do this to myself. I get the latest Sebastian St. Cyr mystery as soon as I possibly can, read it in a day, and then look around and bemoan the fact that I have to wait a whole year for the next one. You'd think I'd learn--to take my time, to savor the experience, to let it last as long as possible. But, no. These stories are so good. I just can't help gobbling them up. Harris writes an incredible story using her skills as a scholar to research the period, sprinkle interesting facts throughout the narrative (without boring us silly with minute details), and peopling the plot with both real personalities of the time as well as fictional characters with depth.
Devlin's wife Hero has played a role in his detective work occasionally throughout the series and it was nice to see her more involved in this latest case as well. Her contacts in the scholarly realm helped Devlin discover the meaning behind various Celtic and druidic symbols which cropped up along the way. Tom, his tiger, and Calhoun also had their moments to shine--tracking down important witnesses and bits of information that Devlin needed to unravel the case.
I will say that this is quite the complicated plot--far more than I realized while reading it. I can't say much without giving things away, but there are a number of threads to keep track of and I didn't manage keep hold of all of them. The ending was a surprise...but a satisfying surprise. I was a bit disappointed that we still haven't made any progress on finding out more about Devlin's heritage nor has there been a follow-through on a dangling issue from Hero's side of the family tree. Added to that, we now have to wonder about Sebastian's sister Amanda and if what he predicted for her future will come true. Her son Bayard may have been a nasty piece of work, but she's not far behind....I'm hoping that the next installment will bring some closure on at least one of these issues. ★★★★ and 1/2
First line: Where the bloody hell am I?
"It never ceases to amaze me how otherwise intelligent, reasonable men can have such faulty, antiquated notions about the true nature of fully one half the human race." (Hero, Lady Devlin; p. 49)
Last line: "They got away!"
*****************
Deaths = 19 (two drowned; two stabbed; one burned to death; three strangled; three natural; two in war; one beaten to death; five shot)
Synopsis from the book flap: Can you imagine the most cantankerous book editor alive? Part Voldemort, part Cruella de Vil (if she were a dude), and worse in appearance and odor than a gluttonous farm pig? A man who makes no secret of his love of cheese or his disdain of unworthy authors? That man is Herman Mildew.
Let's start by saying that this was an admirable project--get 80ish authors to help put together a book that will be sold to benefit a nonprofit group that encourages young creative writers. That's a great project. I applaud it most sincerely. In theory, a whodunnit which featured 80 suspects all providing alibis and ostensibly letting the reader figure out the solution to who killed the odious Herman Q. Mildew, the editor of nightmares, sounds like a real winner. I was all ready to put my "little grey cells" to work and try to outwit the authors and discover the murderer.
However...
Please note that I cannot continue that thought without completely spoiling the book. If my one-star rating doesn't scare you off, then you probably won't want to continue reading until you've read this for yourself.
However, this is, in my opinion, a huge hornswoggle. There is no cohesive plot. The reader will not pick up clues among the authors' alibis. There is no way to figure out "whodunnit" because [Here's the SPOILER] Herman Q. Mildew is NOT dead. Nobody killed him. The whole book is a sham. Now, if we believe some these authors, there have been some deaths along the way (and bless them for that because I can still count the book for the Medical Examiner Challenge) but none of those were Mildew. This could have been such a great project if, following in the footsteps of The Detection Club, there had been a real plot, a generally agreed-upon setting of the scene, and then the authors had proceeded (round-robin fashion) to write up their alibis--their side of the story, adding what details they might and those that followed need to take those new details into account. Then the reader could have sifted through clues laid down in the framing story as well as the alibis and had a chance to determine the killer. As it was, this was the biggest disappointment I've read so far this year. The only thing (well, things) that save it is that it was for a good cause and David Levithan's poem/albi which is a terrific send-up of a William Carlos Williams poem. ★ for those two things.
First line: Ladies and gentlemen...and I use those terms loosely because I know you are all writers and illustrators...we have a bit of a situation.
Last line: You hold the answer to that question in your hands
****************
Deaths = 4 (one natural; one fell from height; one food poisoning; one frozen to death)
Ginger & Basil Reed wind up with a houseful of guests at Christmas. First, Mr. Doyle a friend of her late father's writes to say he and his wife will be visiting England and wants to discuss some things with Ginger. So, of course, she asks them to stay for the holidays. Then her step-mother Sally and half-sister Louisa arrive unexpectedly on the doorstep--because they wanted to surprise Ginger. So, of course, she opens her home to them as well. Then, for Christmas dinner, there's Basil's mother and father (always a jolly couple--especially now that Scout's adoption has gone through. The adoption they opposed....), Dr. Gupta and his wife, and an older couple who are friends of the elder Reeds. Oh--and, quite by chance, Ginger meets the brother of Mrs. Doyle at a Christmas Eve charity luncheon and invites him as well.
The dinner is a bit tense--for reasons Ginger can only guess at--but festive enough. At least until Mr. Doyle chokes and lands face first in his second helping of plum pudding...dead. At first it looks like he might have choked on one of the items hidden in the pudding; a dreadful accident, but an accident all the same. But Dr. Gupta's examination (in his capacity as police surgeon) reveals that it's more complicated than that. There was no obstruction to the breathing passages. So, what killed the man. And more importantly...who killed him?
A fun novella mystery that's perfect for Christmas (or Christmas in April, as it happens). A bit rushed since it's a shorter work and there aren't a lot of red herrings to muddy the waters, but it's always delightful to visit with Ginger, Basil, and the other regulars. I do wish we could give annoying relatives a rest, though. That theme is getting a bit tired. ★★★
First line: The journal remained tucked away in the bottom drawer of Mrs. Ginger Reed's bedside table along with a photo of her late husband, Daniel Lord Gold.
Last line: "Let's go to the Ritz!"
****************
Deaths = one poisoned
Basil and Ginger Reed are invited to a charity event at the Eaton Square home of Mr. Reginald Peck. There is obvious tension between Peck and his wife, Peck and his children, and even Peck and his solicitor. Peck is an invalid whose demeanor may be affected by his health and that's what the Reeds chalk it all up to. But the next day Basil is called back to the Peck home--this time as a Scotland Yard inspector. Reginald Peck has been found dead and while it is assumed that the death is natural, it soon proves to be murder by poisoning. And questioning soon proves that Peck's family had good cause to wish him dead. He wasn't a pleasant family man and they all could use an inheritance. Even his son-in-law who poses as an Indian guru and claims no interest in sordid material matters. It's just a matter of deciding whose motive was biggest and who had the best opportunity. And then Mrs. Peck dies from poisoning as well...Ginger and Basil will need to sift through motives and opportunity to discover whose behind the poisonings.
Meanwhile, Basil's parents come for a visit and, though they themselves are fairly unconventional, they take great exception Basil & Ginger's plan to adopt Scout, Ginger's ward. Heaven forbid that their heir be a former street urchin! And they threaten to disinherit Basil if the adoption goes through. Considering how much the elder Reeds go against convention--flitting off on trips to South Africa and India and adopting a South African child (who had since been murdered), you'd think they'd be a little more flexible.
This was another solid entry in the Ginger Gold mystery series and it serves up a very interesting solution that I didn't see coming--at least I didn't see one half of the solution coming. I did figure out the other half. I like the way Ginger and Basil's teamwork plays out--Basil is the official arm of the law and Ginger plies the suspects with charm and disarming conversation. Very nicely done. A quick read with a pleasant mystery that makes for a comfortable read. ★★★ and 1/2
First line: Mrs. Ginger Reed, alias Lady Gold, had reserved a box at the London Playhouse Theatre for her family, who now mingling with anticipation and glasses of champagne in hand, waited for the signal that the production of Shakespeare's Romeo & Juliet was about to begin.
Last line: "I meant the four of us, Bossy."
*****************
Deaths = 3 (two poisoned; one accident)
From the book flap:
When barrister Gabriel Ward steps out of his rooms at exactly two minutes to seven on a sunny May morning in 1901, his mind is so full of his latest case—the disputed authorship of bestselling children’s book Millie the Temple Church Mouse—that he scarcely registers the body of the Lord Chief Justice of England on his doorstep.
But even he cannot fail to notice the judge’s dusty bare feet, in shocking contrast to his flawless evening dress, nor the silver carving knife sticking out of his chest. In the shaded courtyards and ancient buildings of the Inner Temple, the hidden heart of London’s legal world, murder has spent centuries confined firmly to the casebooks. Until now . . .
The police can enter the Temple only by consent, so who better to investigate this tragic breach of law and order than a man who prizes both above all things? But murder doesn’t answer to logic or reasoned argument, and Gabriel soon discovers that the Temple’s heavy oak doors are hiding more surprising secrets than he’d ever imagined . . .
My take: This is a fun first mystery from a King's Counsel turned novelist. Smith brings the Temple of the early 1900s to life and peoples it with extraordinary characters from our amateur sleuth Gabriel Ward to Constable Wright, the officer assigned to assist him, to young Percival Dunning, the son of the murdered man, Gabriel Ward is a man after Hercule Poirot's heart--making sure his inkwell and gold pencil are positioned "just so" on his desk and looking for method and order and connections where others might miss them. He also brings a warmth and humanity to the legal field that is in sharp contrast to some of his colleagues.
Many of the barristers and judges who live in the Temple are looking how best to position themselves to climb the judicial ladder, if they get justice for their clients or those who appear before them then that's all well and good too. But that may not be their primary goal. This gives them a mighty good motive for doing away with the Lord Chief Justice, because some of them would love to step into his robes. But it's also possible that he was killed for his shoes...after all, his shoes are missing. And then there's the rumor that there have been some odd goings-on in the Temple Church. Maybe Lord Dunning came upon something that someone would rather not have know and paid the price. Though Ward's brief is only to interview the Temple inhabitants and report to the police (with a mandate from the Treasurer to find evidence that some miscreant from outside the Temple walls awas responsible), he keeps investigating long after the last interview. And he's amazed to find that there may be a connection between his important case and murder.
I thoroughly enjoyed Gabriel Ward's first venture into detection--even though I did spot the suspect about midway through. It was still great fun to watch Ward and Wright work their way toward the solution. I hope that Wright will get the recognition due him and his inspector won't steal all the glory.... ★★★★
First line: It is anybody's guess what went through the mind of Lord Norman Dunning, Lord Chief Justice of England, on the evening of 20 May 1901, in those frantic seconds when he knew that his death was inevitable.
Last line: He always went home at nearly six o'clock.
*****************
Deaths = 3 (one stabbed; one natural; one poisoned)
Superintendent Thomas Littlejohn is spending the night in Fenshire after helping tie up loose ends in a forgery case with connections to London. It's been raining cats and dogs and when the torrential rains bring to light a man's corpse (stabbed--not drowned), the Chief Constable takes advantage of having the Yard man on the spot. The body is quickly identified as belonging to Jim Lane, a man who ran a hoop-la stand and traveled from fair to fair. Why would anyone want to stab a fair showman to death?
It doesn't take Littlejohn long to discover that Lane was leading a double-life--running hoop-la during the week and running home to his home in Yorkshire where he's known as James Teasdale. And it takes even less time (after meeting the family back home) for the superintendent to understand why Teasdale might have wanted a different life. Littlejohn's instincts tell him that the answer to Teasdale's death lies in Yorkshire and the contents of the man's stomach prove him right. He was killed not long after taking afternoon tea at home and there was no way he could have made it back to Ely based on the progress of digestion.
Teasdale's family spends little time actually mourning him; they're more concerned about the scandal surrounding his double-life. We're left to wonder whether one of them thought murder better than disgrace. Then blackmail rears its ugly head and when the blackmailer disappears (after having tried it on with Teasdale before his death), it looks like Littlejohn may have a second murder on his hands. But which of the family did it? And why?
I may be a bit of an outlier (among GAD fans) on this one, but I didn't find this to be one of Bellair's strongest efforts. On the plus side, he (as always) provides terrific character sketches, but what characters. There isn't a member of Teasdale's family (or, rather, his wife's family) who is a pleasant character. I wouldn't want to invite any of them home for tea. And, it amazes me how sympathetic Littlejohn is to this crew. Bellairs also gives good descriptions of the countryside and small towns. The plot is a decent one...except for the ending. I'm a trifle disappointed with how justice is meted out. It may seem like one of the characters gets their just desserts, even if no one winds up behind bars (it's spoiler territory to describe the "just desserts"), but I'd be a lot more satisfied if someone had been officially punished for the crime. Poor Jim Teasdale--just when it seemed like he'd found a bit of happiness, it all came to a violent end. Someone really needs to pay for that. ★★ and 3/4 (just can't bring myself to give a full three)
First line: "Are you awake, Littlejohn?"
Last line: Littlejohn often wonders how long the trio of sisters will have to wait for their inheritance. Elvira, Phoebe, and Chloe.
*****************
Deaths = 4 (one stabbed; one drowned; one natural; one fell from height)