Mystery Lover...but overall a very eclectic reader. Will read everything from the classics to historical fiction. Biography to essays. Not into horror or much into YA. If you would like me to review a book, then please see my stated review policy BEFORE emailing me.
Please Note: This is a book blog. It is not a platform for advertising.
Please do NOT contact me to ask that I promote your NON-book websites or products. Thank you.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
All reviews and materials posted are the property of My Reader's Block (Bev Hankins) unless otherwise attributed. Please request permission to use any material in whole or in part elsewhere on the web or in any other format.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Mystery & Crime: NYPL Book of Answers (mini-review)
This is a
decent little mystery reference book with some interesting information.
However, I am a little perplexed by a supposed mystery expert who gets
several fairly common (to mystery readers) facts wrong. Hercule Poirot
and Nero Wolfe are private investigators--they get paid for most of
their investigations--therefore, they are not amateurs. Sherlock Holmes made his startling return from the dead in "The Empty House" not The Hound of the Baskervilles. Pam & Jerry North (of the Lockridge mystery series) had several cats over the long series of books--in addition to Martini (which according to Mr. Pearsall is the only cat), there are Gin, Sherry, Ruffy, Pete, Toughy, Stilts and Shadow. Lord Peter Wimsey was a Major in World War I, not a Captain. I could go on. It makes it a bit difficult to take the author's word for it on the information that is new to me, when he is mistaken on several counts throughout the book. There is plenty of correct information, though, so I'll take it in stride.
It is an interesting read and there is a good smattering of quotes from some of the big name books. (I love quotes!). Two and 3/4 stars--rounded to three on Goodreads.
The Sherlock mistake is due to Doyle writing Baskervilles between The Final Problem and The Empty House. Sloppy research - even an under read Sherlockian like me wouldn't make that mistake.
2 comments:
With your vast knowledge of the genre, you really should consider writing this king of book! :)
The Sherlock mistake is due to Doyle writing Baskervilles between The Final Problem and The Empty House. Sloppy research - even an under read Sherlockian like me wouldn't make that mistake.
Post a Comment