SCAM artist alert

Apparently there is someone calling himself "Luigi Calloway" out there who is claiming to be associated with the Mount TBR Reading Challenge. He is contacting authors and telling them if they pay him, then their books will be used for the challenge. It's possible he's also telling people they must pay to participate in any way. Please know that there is absolutely no charge associated in any way with this reading challenge and that this person does NOT represent me or anything associated with my blog. I DO NOT endorse anything that he claims.There will NEVER be a reason for anyone to have to pay for participation in any way for any of my challenges. If only people who exert this much time and effort on scamming people would put it into something worthwhile....like reading their own books! A message to Luigi: Please cease and desist contacting authors (or anyone) in my name or claiming to represent this reading challenge. You absolutely DO NOT.

Showing posts with label Medical Examiner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Medical Examiner. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Murder in Luxury


 Murder in Luxury (1981) by Hugh Pentecost (Judson Philips)

Murder takes over the exclusive Hotel Beaumont once more and its legendary manager Pierre Chambrun and Mark Haskell, his publicity manager and right-hand man, are going to have to stop it in its tracks. When a drug pusher/pimp is found shot to death in the apartment of Valerie Summers, her lawyer (a friend of Chambrun's) presumes upon his old friend to give the lady a place to stay. Valerie had come to New York to escape publicity and bad memories after her beloved husband had died in a fire. She's the lonely, rich heiress of the McCandless fortune who just wanted a place where she could be anonymous and forget the past. But now she finds herself suspect number one in the murder of a man she says she's never seen...and she's beginning to think she carries a load of deadly bad luck for anyone she comes in contact with. Her mother died giving her life. Her husband died in a fire. A friend and her son died in a plane crash after Val gave them the money to fly. And now this. And the man in her apartment isn't the last. Another man is found dead in her hotel room and then the policeman assigned to guard her room is killed. Lieutenant Keegan, the police detective in charge of the case, is sure that Val is mad killer behind that beautiful face. The only problem is--he and another officer and her lawyer were all with her when that police guard was killed. And if she didn't kill him then maybe she didn't kill the other two. But if not...then who did? Chambrun and Haskell are determined to find out.

*************Slight Spoiler Ahead***************

The entire time I was reading this I had a feeling of déjà vu. I can find no indication that I have read this one before (not even in the days before blogging), but the ending felt especially familiar. Maybe I read it and just forgot to log it. Anyway...the ending spectacular--mostly due to Mrs. Victoria Haven, the 81-year-old permanent resident of one of the three penthouse suites at the top of the hotel. She comes bursting into the grand finale and does everything she can to get the killer to break his hold on Valerie and Mark. Her time on the stage is well worth the price of admission. The mystery is pretty middle of the road--the culprit isn't well-hidden because, quite frankly, there just aren't many suspects to be had. Especially if you know (as anyone who reads even one of the series will know) that if Chambrun and Haskell are protecting someone in one of their hotel rooms, then that someone didn't do it. But the build-up to the finale is good and I thoroughly enjoy Chambrun and his world. So, overall a good solid read. ★★ 

First line: Looking back at the many stories I've written about murder and violence at the Beaumont, New York's top luxury hotel, people might get the notion that that gracious and elegant establishment is not a place to stay in safety.

Last line: "I'm sure as hell going to try, ma'am," I said.
*******************

Deaths = 8 (four shot; one natural; one fire; two plane crash)

Monday, September 14, 2026

Property of a Lady


 Property of a Lady (1983) by Anthony Oliver

Margaret Garland came into a fair inheritance when her mother died. She'd spent her time taking care of her mother and hadn't really had much of a life outside the home. She opts to stay in the cottage in Flaxfield rather than the flat in London. One evening when driving home, she spies a young man hitchhiking along the road. Everything she's been taught tells her she shouldn't stop--but seeing his pale face in the rearview mirror, she finds herself braking and giving him a lift. He's in such a bad way that she takes him in and her doctor tells her that it would be best if he weren't moved, but it could be arranged if Margaret would prefer not to have a stranger in the house.

Lizzie Thomas is the nosey parker older woman in the village. Her binoculars (a gift from her friend, retired police inspector John Webber, sees Mark Carter helped into Margaret's house. All her inquisitive instincts are on the alert, but she has a difficult job finding out anything about him at first. It's revealed, however, that he was on his way to visit his mother who is a resident at Henworth Hall--a health spa for wealthy ladies in need of dieting, relaxation, or just some time out of the spotlight. He's also the son of  the (now deceased) well-known antiques dealer who was half of Carter & Monmouth...and he has quite the flair for antiques himself. It soon becomes apparent that Margaret is quite smitten. 

Lizzie on the other hand is bothered by the young man and an incident involving her cat Bunter makes her even more uneasy. Then Mark just up and disappears--and so does his mother. Lizzie can't leave that alone and, so, with the help of Webber and her son-in-law Jimmy "Betsey" Trottwood, a local antiques dealer she sets out to find out everything she can about Mark Carter. Some of it is unsettling indeed, but, as Webber points out, none of it is actionable. They are left in a wait-and-see mode until an explosive grand finale which takes place in the middle of a very tense round of bidding at a local auction.

As I've mentioned in reviews of other titles by Oliver, his strong suit is his characters.  John and Lizzie are well-defined, interesting, and, most importantly, believable people. As are most of the supporting characters. Lizzie is the queen of the art of gossip.  And we know this because Oliver makes it plain in her interactions with the other characters. She manages to find just the right tone to take with each person she talks to and succeeds where more official inquiries fail. I've read mysteries before where a certain character supposedly just had this "quality" that made others confide all sorts of secrets to them...but I never got a real feel for why that was.  I certainly never thought that I'd be spilling the beans to them myself.  With Lizzie, it's different.  I could see her plopping a cup of tea and some biscuits down if front of me and in no time at all she'd know everything I had to tell. I thoroughly enjoy the way Lizzie and John interact and form a team.

Several reviewers have mentioned how humorous Oliver's stories are. I don't think I could say that the mystery itself is humorous; it's really quite dark at times, especially in the finale. But the relationship between Lizzie & John--hysterical. Just the picture of her convincing him to sit in his underpants in front of the coal fire to soothe his arthritis is enough--let alone her running commentary on the matter. 

This really isn't a whodunnit. We know very early on who the suspect is. It is more of a what-exactly-has-he-done and are-we-going-to-be-able-to-prove-it? When it comes to the mystery, I much prefer that there be a definite crime to solve and trying to figure out who did it rather than knowing that somebody is up to something (or has been up to something) and can we figure out what and pin it on them when we do. But as a character study, it's brilliant. ★★  primarily for the characters.

First line: Everyone said it was dangerous.

Last lines: I must find someone to look after my cat. Someone kind.
*********************

Deaths = 6 (two natural; one drowned; one hit by train; one beheaded; one shot)

Sunday, September 13, 2026

Who Killed Me?


 Who Killed Me? (1979) by Joan Allan

Valerie Lambert is an account executive for an advertising agency that is producing commercials for a new perfume named for Meri Milton, film star. Setting up filming schedules for ten one-minute commercials shot at various London landmarks was a feat in and of itself, but dealing with the bickering between Meri and the film's director, Hans Richmond, and the hostility between Meri and Nelson Bishop, the rising star executive for Associated Cosmetics (home of the new perfume), and the resentment between Hans and Nelson was enough to drive Valerie to distraction. And just when she's successfully smoothed the ruffled feathers of the movie star and her director, two policemen show up at her hotel room at one o-clock in the morning and ask her to come with them. At the end of their journey is the dead body of Nelson Bishop--a knife in his chest and a note pinned to his suit jacket that says:

WHO KILLED ME? ASK VALERIE LAMBERT. 836-4343

It follows that Inspector Haverstock is curious to know why Valerie's name is on the note. She gives him all the background info she can and, once the time of death is established, is cleared of suspicion. So, of course, she wants to lend a hand in the investigation. 

She and Haverstock will have to sift through the suspects. There are the obvious ones--Meri and Hans. But were their disagreements with the executive deep enough to result in murder? There is also the head of Associated Cosmetics, Perry Nash, who may have found that his anticipated successor had a few too many skeletons in the closet--or had too great an interest in Nash's daughter Adrienne. Which brings us to Adrienne--she and Bishop had a fling but then she transferred her affections to an older actor by the name of Clifford Frampton. Maybe Bishop didn't want to take no for an answer? As our two detectives keep digging, they discover that Bishop had a little side-line of blackmail going on. Maybe he pushed one of his victims just a little too far?

This another of a series of Zebra Mystery Puzzler Books that I got in an assortment for Christmas a couple of years. As indicated on the cover, the set-up for these books is that all the clues necessary for the reader to solve the mystery before the final reveal are given in the cover photo, various illustrations within the story, and, as with good mysteries clues given in the text. I obtained and read one of this series a very long time ago (over 30 years) and enjoyed it (thus the request for my hubby to order up the Zebra books on Ebay). Since then I've read three of the lot of fifteen or so with mixed results. 

In general, this series consists of pretty solid but somewhat lightweight mysteries. And even when I thought the clues given in the pictures weren't especially necessary to solve the mystery(because there weren't enough red herring suspects or whatever) at least the clues were there in case you needed them. However--for this mystery, nearly all of the clues make sense only after the solution is revealed. I didn't pick up a single one before the reveal and I can't for the life of me figure out what the extra clue is on the cover. Everything you see--from the knife to the message--is explained in the text. 

I also find it really difficult to believe that Haverstock would allow some random American to flit about in his Scotland Yard investigation AND that she would have better ideas about tracking down the knife and the pen used for the note than an experienced police detective. He acts like her discoveries are just brilliant and who would have thought? Yes, there are all sorts of amateurs barging into official investigations in detective fiction and I happily go along with most of them--when there's a good mystery plot payoff. Unfortunately, I'm not buying it this time.  and 1/2 (I almost gave it two, but I don't think it's as good as another Zebra Puzzler that I did give two stars, so...)

First line: Valerie Lambert's knife sliced through a pâté of fresh duck livers, truffles, and pistachio nuts.

Last line: Whoever was calling Valerie Lambert was going to have to wait.
*********************

Deaths = 2 (one stabbed; one drowned)

Sunday, September 6, 2026

Beverly Gray's Return


 Beverly Gray's Return (1939) by Clair Blank

This is the ninth book in the series by Clair Blank. Unlike the Nancy Drew series, Clair Blank was a single author who wrote all 25 books in the series. The books begin with Beverly's freshman year in college and follow her from there through various adventures, work for the government, and finally as a newspaper reporter. Her "Return" finds Beverly and company preparing to board the Susabella at Hawaii for the return trip to New York. Along the way on their cruise around the world, they have picked up a new friend in Nikki Abbott. Nikki asks for the boat to wait just a bit longer because she needs to run a last-minute errand and she asks Beverly to go with her. They set out for a perfume shop where Nikki had heard she could get a very special perfume made. The girls are asked to wait in a side room while it's being prepared but Nikki thinks it's taking a bit long and goes out of the room to check on things--closing the door behind her. When Nikki doesn't return, Beverly tries the door and finds it locked. And when she finally gets out and gets to the dock, she finds that the Susabella has left without her. Why did Nikki lock her in? How could her friends have left her? Finding out what has happened will take Beverly on an adventure that involves impersonation, royalty, stolen jewels, a kidnapping, and the beginnings of another adventure....

I've mentioned before that Beverly Gray is another heroine that I wish I had met when I was young. I would have loved reading about a detective with my own name! She's resourceful and independent and a good role model for young girls. On the one hand, she's a bit more realistic than Nancy Drew--going to work and living away from home in the big city. But then, I think she gives Nancy a run for her money in the number of close scrapes she has. She also has way more adventures than most of us do in everyday life, but the stories wouldn't be nearly as exciting without them.

This one is quite full--with mysterious princesses on the run from an evil government official from their home country, jewel thieves who are selling stolen property and replacing the real jewels with fakes, the kidnapping of one Beverly's friends when the jewel thieves thinks she's holding out on them over some of the jewels, and a new, unsolved (in this installment) mystery surrounding another girl from their school days who was in an accident and has lost her memory. Of course, the immediate mystery of why Nikki left Beverly behind in Hawaii and how (and why) she fooled Beverly's friends is explained. And the jewel thieves are caught. 

These stories are fairly simple mysteries, aimed at young readers. But they are fun and I always enjoy reading about my namesake's adventures. ★★

First line: "Why do I have to get up at such an hour?" Lenora Whitehill grumbled as she followed Lois Mason and Beverly Gray to where other the other members of the yachting party were at breakfast.

Last line: We will leave the Alpha Delta girls and their friends at this juncture, but we shall pick up the thread of their story again in "Beverly Gray, Reporter" when they manage to involve themselves in more amazing adventures.
**********************

Deaths = two in a revolution

These Old Shades


 These Old Shades (1926) by Georgette Heyer

Justin Alastair, the Duke of Avon, though well-born has been known as a rake and a scoundrel...and by the name "Satanas." He'd be the first to admit that he's lived up to quite a few of the rumors. So, it's not a surprise that his friends and family find it hard to believe that he's taken in a dirty boy who runs into him one night on the streets of Paris simply out of the goodness of his heart. There must be some ulterior motive. And there is. The boy, Léon, is running away from a sure beating at the hands of his tavern-keeper brother. But the boy--with copper red hair and fine-boned structure--looks nothing like his squarely-built, loutish brother. And Avon sees promise in the lad....a promise of a means to serve up a nice cold dish of revenge to his enemy, the Comte de Saint-Vire.

Avon trains the lad on how to be his page and he sets out with him among the quality--visiting both the most elevated circles as well as the gaming houses of Paris. He particularly wants to parade him about wherever Saint Vire-might be. Léon sees Avon as his savior and will brook no disrespectful discussions of the Duke's supposed satanic habits. His temper matches his reddish hair and he's willing to fight anyone who disrespects his "Monsignor."

Even when Georgette Heyer was starting out as a historical romance author, she loved to mix romance with mystery. And, when she wrote novels that were clearly designated as mysteries, she loved to throw a bit of romance in there. The two genres seem to be inextricably linked  for her. And there are all kinds of mysteries to be solved here in one of her earliest regency-based books--from why the Duke of Avon and Comte de Saint-Vire have such an enmity between them to who Léon really is to how and when Avon will serve up justice to his "very dear friend," Saint-Vire to whether or not anyone will be murdered.

Avon realized quite soon that Léon is not quite what "he" seems and exchanges his page Léon for a beautiful ward by the name of Léonie. This upsets Saint-Vire even more than seeing the copper-headed page all over Paris and it leads to kidnapping, fired shots, and...eventually death and scandal among the nobility.

Such a fun early book by Heyer! It is especially good once the transformation to Léonie is complete. And the action really picks up once Saint-Vire makes his attempt at kidnapping. Léonie and Lord Rupert (Avon's younger brother) make an excellent team in outwitting and making the escape from the Comte. And Avon's methods in bringing about Sain-Vire's downfall is really quite satisfying. What keeps this from a five-star rating is Léon/Léonie's irritating habit of weeping over Avon and coming to his defense (like this Duke really needs it...), the Duke's need to constantly refer to her as "infant" (she's 19!), and the huge (20-some years) age difference. On the plus side, The characters are witty, charismatic, and interesting. Even the side characters are terrific (mostly)--from Lord Rupert to Lady Fanny Marling (Avon's sister) to Hugh Davenant (Avon's friend). Rupert is particularly hilarious in every conversation. The mystery behind it all really isn't well-hidden. I got it from the beginning but it was interesting waiting to see how and when Avon would spring his trap against Saint-Vire. The one mystery that isn't solved--just what it was that happened between the two men that caused Avon to look so hard and long for the perfect revenge. ★★★★

*May I just say the person on the cover of my edition looks nothing like what I imagine Léon/Léonie to look like. Where are the short copper curls?

First line: A gentleman was strolling down a side street in Paris, on his way back from the house of one Madame de Verchoureux

Last line: "Ah, bah!" said the Duchess of Avon.
********************

Deaths = 3 (two in the plague; one shot)

Monday, August 31, 2026

Death of a Harvard Freshman


 Death of a Harvard Freshman
(1984) by Victoria Silver

Lauren Adler has spent most of her time in her freshman Russian Revolution seminar at Harvard looking at Russell Bernard. Russell is a very handsome, very brilliant young black man who has just about everyone interested in him. Lauren wonders if she'd ever have a chance with him...and then, after a seminar session in which classmate Melissa Wu describes the rather brutal death of Rasputin, she finds herself scheduled for a coffee date with the dreamy man. She can hardly believe her luck.

But...she waits at the coffee shop for an hour past the appointed time and still no Russell. She can't believe she's been stood up and she goes back to the dorm hoping for a phone call with an explanation. What she gets is her roommate Carol, a staffer on Harvard's Crimson newspaper, coming home late to tell her that Russell has been murdered. And the method of his murder seems to mirror that of Rasputin in some ways. When Lauren talks with the police and tells them about the seminar session and how, like Rasputin, multiple methods of murder were used on Russell (a bash on the head, gunshots, and the body thrown in the river), the police seem totally uninterested. They're sure that it was some thug along the river...the river's not a safe place be at night, you know.

Lauren is convinced that she's right--someone from the seminar has killed Russell. But who--and why? Was it Scott Duchaine or Brian O'Donnell...two Southerners who may have a racist streak in them? Or maybe it's Katherine Butler, a militant revolutionary who didn't think Russell was black enough. She believes in violent revolution for racial equality and thought Russell and others like him were too soft in their black protests. Others from the seminar may also have had a reason to kill Russell--like Sandy Grayson whose jealousy may have driven her to murder. Or Tracy Nicholson who carries a gun and may not have accepted that her affair with Russell was over even though she has taken up with Bert Rosen. And maybe Bert Rosen, the blond surfer boy from California, doesn't like playing second fiddle to the brilliant black man. Or Melissa Wu who may have taken the story of Rasputin too literally. Or Andrew Stein who is very unbalanced and seems very fixated on murder of any sort. Parker Kendall runs at night...very often down by the river. He could be the murderer for reasons unknown.

Lauren and her best friend, Michael Hunt, decide to team up as amateur sleuths to see if they can solve the mystery that seems to be too much for the local police. But they need to be careful. Someone has killed once...and will soon kill again. They don't want to find themselves next on the killer's to-do list.

A fairly straight-forward amateur sleuth mystery. It has a nice, classic mystery tone--with a closed circle of suspects and plenty of red herrings to follow up. And I didn't catch on to whodunnit until a certain sentence is spoken in the final chapters. I'm just pleased I realized its importance before Lauren did. The big drawback is that Lauren and Michael spend way too many late-night sessions rehashing everybody's motives and coming to the conclusion that pretty much any of them could have done it. Since these two aren't professional detectives, they can't really do much except talk and talk and talk to the suspects. I'm surprised that those who didn't do it don't get a little fed up with all the questions and accusations....

I do really like Lauren and Michael though. They have a good solid friendship and it's nice to see how their circle builds over the course of the story. And Silver provides us with a nice tense denouement.
★★ and 1/2  

First line: Melissa Wu was just finishing her presentation on Rasputin.

Last line: "I feel an inexplicable but all too familiar craving for vanilla ice cream and hot fudge."
**********************

Deaths = 3 (one poisoned; two shot)

Thursday, August 27, 2026

Murder, Murder, Little Star


 Murder, Murder, Little Star (1977) by Marian Babson

Twinkle is a child star--ten years old going on a very b---- forty. She wears dark glasses, a sable coat, and an attitude that alienates everyone she comes in contact with. But onscreen, she's a dream and her public adores her. And she sells. And that's all the producer and the director of her newest movie care about. It'll be worth it to put up with the child tyrant if they can make a huge profit on the movie. But--as filming begins, it becomes apparent that someone has tired of putting up with Twinkle. First her morning milk is poisoned with near fatal results for the crewmember who has been secretly drinking the milk for her (Twinkle hates her morning milk). Then the scriptwriter falls to his death while trying to prove that tap-dancing on a very high roof while wearing a safety harness is absolutely safe--so of course Twinkle can do it. Twinkle was sure it was not...and she was right.

Who has it in for Twinkle? Could it be her mother who had to sacrifice her own career for her daughter's stardom? Or perhaps her bother's beau who wants mummy to be free from encumbrances? Maybe it's the produce or director--after all they have heavily ensured their little star and perhaps they'd rather have insurance money than to have to wait for box office proceeds. Or could it be one of her co-stars--she has managed to offend, insult, and generally make herself obnoxious to all of them. Has anything rankled so deeply that it has resulted in attempted murder? 

Frances Armitage has been hired as chaperone for the young star. She sees beyond the makeup and trappings of fame--and sees a young girl afraid of getting too old for child parts and losing her star power. She sees a lonely girl in need of a friend. And she sees a girl who is truly afraid. Frances vows to protect her young charge and tries to discover what is going on behind the scenes. But it all boils down to a killer who can't keep out the spotlight giving a confessional monologue.

A decent mystery spoiled by little actual detection and the confessional wrap-up. The killer doesn't even need any prodding to to start boasting about the plot to severely injure Twinkle or outright murder her--take your pick. I enjoyed Marian Babson books very much when I first read some in the 80s/90s, but I'm not sure she's what I'm looking for in the 2020s. The best part of the book for me wasn't the mystery--it was Frances and her relationship with Twinkle and her relationship with her son and daughter-in-law. I love how she's trying to get her independence while DIL seems intent on running her life. Good on Frances for sticking up for herself. ★★ and 1/2

First line: There was really, Frances Armitage thought complacently, a lot of nonsense talked about the difficulty of re-entering the employment market.

Last line: "I've just been called on a new assignment...."
**********************

Deaths = 3 (two in explosions; one fell from height)

Saturday, August 22, 2026

Murder & Sullivan


 Murder & Sullivan (1998) by Sara Hoskinson Frommer

Oliver, Indiana is hit by a tornado which leaves a path of destruction in its wake. Joan Spencer--director of Oliver's Senior Citizen Center, musician, and sometimes amateur sleuth--has to take shelter in a ditch, protecting a young girl who had wandered away from her family. The family belongs to Judge David Putnam. Near-tragedy is followed by tragedy when David is killed while performing in a local production of Gilbert and Sullivan's Ruddigore.

Putnam plays one of the "ghosts"--the family portraits on the leading characters wall. During the second act, the portraits come to life. Except for Sir Roderick (David's character). David is found stabbed through the heart. Joan was playing in the orchestra and her beau, police lieutenant Fred Lundquist, was in the audience--neither of them saw anything suspicious until David's body fell to the stage. Investigation seems to prove that only those playing the parts of the ghosts could have had the opportunity, but who had motive. David was well-liked--or so it seemed.

Further digging reveals that several of the cast members had been involved in court cases that had come before the judge...not always with the results they would have liked. Dr. Robert Cutts--malpractice suit. Christopher Eads and his wife Liz MacDonald--divorce case. Virgil Shoals--builder, over a house he had built (but settled out of court). They also find out that Chris Eads blamed David more directly for his divorce than for just the ruling. Liz has carried a torch for David for years and seems to have added fuel to the flames recently. Chris thinks they were carrying on an affair, but he still wants Liz back--is that enough to kill over? Fred and Joan keep asking questions and looking for answers. Until somebody thinks Joan is getting a little to close for comfort.

Another solid entry (#3) in the series. Good plot with plenty of red herring suspects--my only quibble is not enough time is spent investigating the possibilities of these suspects. A little more muddying of the waters would have gone a long way. Once we learned the nature of the weapon I quickly spotted the culprit. But I enjoy Joan and Frommer's portrayal of southern Indiana (being a resident of the fictional Oliver's near-neighbor, Bloomington). I look forward to the next installment sitting on my TBR shelves (Witness in Bishop Hill). ★★

First line: Joan Spencer was on foot when the siren went off.

Last line: "I have every intention of messing with your mom for a long time."
*****************************

Deaths = one stabbed

Wednesday, August 19, 2026

The Charteris Mystery


 The Charteris Mystery (1925) by A. E. Fielding

Rose Charteris, daughter of Professor Charteris (more on him in a moment), is found dead from a broken neck at the bottom of a sand pit on the estate of Colonel Scarlett. Scarlett has given over one wing of his home to the Charteris family to use whenever they are in England. The professor is off in Italy somewhere in pursuit of backers for his latest project (synthetic emeralds). Rose was engaged to Count di Monti, an Italian with fascist ties. Also on hand is Scarlett's daughter Sibella (who seems jealous of Rose); his housekeeper, Mrs. Lane; Mr. Thornton, a writer and family friend; and Arthur Bond & John Cockburn, who seem to come as a set and are apparently hooked up to the Foreign Office. There's some mystery over a letter Rose received from her father with an enclosure that has disappeared. And, while the local police and doctor seem to think Rose's death an accident, Thornton feels that there's something not quite right about the scene in the sand pit and calls up Scotland Yard off his own bat.

Enter Chief Inspector Pointer. The Yard can't come unless the locals request it (they haven't), but Pointer is currently on leave and can do whatever he likes on his holiday. So, he decides to come down under the name of Brown, posing as a man in the book business so his connection to Thornton won't be questioned. He immediately finds signs that indicate murder. Now all he has to do is figure out who did it and why? Was di Monti jealous of Rose's sittings for a local artist? Was Sibella so jealous of Rose that she'd do away with her? And why was Mrs. Lane behaving so oddly the night of murder--cloaking herself in veils and driving off late into the night? And who was the man who slept in an empty room and left traces in the summer house--and where did he go? Then someone searches Rose's room as well as her father's London apartment. All correspondence from the professor goes missing. Was Rose killed for possession of the professor's enclosure? And what connection is there fascists and the Russians?

Pointer takes off for Italy in a search for the Professor...and hopefully some answers. But the trail leads him into fascist territory and straight to a couple more bodies. And what starts out as a simple whodunit rapidly takes a leap into political intrigue and the spy/thriller adventure story. Our Scotland Yard detective is apparently a James Bond in disguise (who is adept at actually disguise, by the way) with a Q of his own in the background to supply him with all sorts of nifty gadgets to use when in tight spots:

Leisurely he extracted his cigar case. A thick podgy case, looking none too well made. He touched a spot with his thumb and lifted out a shallow tray...Inside was a flat glass bottle, a file not much longer than a nail-file, but of the stoutest steel, a skeleton key, and a few other interesting and equally useful oddments.

Chief Inspector Pointer has everything he needs for a quick jail-break from the evil fascist's dungeon of doom. The only question is...Is the evil fascist responsible for the deaths in the story?

Despite the fact that this plot takes a sharp turn from traditional mystery to spy/thriller with a detective who behaves more like a secret agent or a Sexton Blake hero and I find it rather unbelievable that Pointer has an endless supply of cash to hire as many private detectives as needed to watch all the suspects and to take a tour of Europe and pay off all sorts of people to tell him what he needs to know....despite all that, I found this to be a quite enjoyable read. It's my first mystery by Fielding and I look forward to reading the other title I have waiting on the TBR shelves here on the Block. ★★ and 1/2

First line: The conversation, judging by what he heard of it as he sauntered to the east lounge, did not threaten any great demands on his brain.

Last lines: "When he discovers the truth, I shouldn't wonder if there was quite a storm scene." And there was.
*********************

Deaths = 5 (one broken neck; one stabbed; one hit by car; one poisoned; one plane crash)

Sunday, August 16, 2026

The Agathas


 The Agathas (2022) by Kathleen Glasgow & Liz Lawson

Synopses (from book flap): Last summer, Alice Ogilvie's basketball-star boyfriend, Steve dumped her. Then she disappeared for five days. She's not talking, so where she went and what happened to her is the biggest mystery in Castle Cove. Or it was, at least. Because now, another one of Steve's girlfriends has vanished, Brooke Donovan. Alice's ex-best friend. And it doesn't look like Brooke will be coming back...

Enter Iris Adams, Alice's tutor. Iris has her own reasons for wanting to disappear, though unlike Alice, she doesn't have the money or the means. That could be changed by the hefty reward Brooke's grandmother is offering to anyone who can share information about her granddaughter's whereabouts. The police are convinced Steve is the culprit, but Alice isn't so sure, and with Iris on her side, she might be able to prove her theory.

In order to get the reward and prove Steve's innocence, they need to figure out who killed Brooke Donovan. And luckily Alice has exactly what they need--the complete works of Agatha Christie. If there's anyone who can teach the girls  how to solve a mystery it's the master herself. But the town of Castle Cove holds many secrets, and Alice and Iris have no idea how much danger they're about to walk into.

So...if you've read one (or more of the blurbs) and believe this to be a really Christie-driven narrative. Yeah, no. There are superficial Agatha Christie connections--like the title. Is there any real reason to give it this title? No. Did anyone at any point in the book every refer to Alice and Iris as "the Agathas"? Again, no--at least not that I noticed. Beyond the fact that Alice throws in a reference to Christie and/or her detective Hercule Poirot (and his little grey cells) periodically, the girls don't really follow any of the fictional detective's particular methods. They talk about the psychology of the crime, but is it figuring out the psychology that leads them to the murderer? No. They talk about "order & method" and go so far as to draw up a list of the suspects and motives and whatnot, but that's about as orderly as they get. The only other connection (and a somewhat tenuous one) is Alice's disappearance. It gives echoes of Christie's own disappearance when she found out her husband was cheating on her.

Full disclosure--I don't read a lot of Young Adult novels. They're just not my thing, but I needed one for a challenge. I chose this one because it was a mystery and it looked like having a nice Christie connection (Golden Age mysteries are more my thing). Now, it's perfectly possible that I might have rated this one higher if my expectations for better Christie connections either hadn't been there in the first place or had been met. But they were there and they weren't met in a satisfying way. The mystery is decent and it was a quick read. I enjoyed watching Alice learn what real friends are like once she gets involved with Iris and Iris's friends (who remind me of the gang from Mystery Inc). We had a multi-layer ending and just when I thought we'd hit the final layer, we went for one more. 

If Young Adult is your genre and/or you go into this with lower Christie connection expectations than me, then you may find yourself giving this one four stars (the most popular rating on Goodreads). As for me... ★★


First line: ALICE OGILVE IS CRAZY.

Last line: We might as well make some trouble together.
********************

Deaths = 3 (two hit on head; one natural)

Monday, August 10, 2026

Dandy Gilver & an Unsuitable Day for Murder


 Dandy Gilver & an Unsuitable Day for Murder (2010) by Catriona McPherson

Synopsis from Publisher's Weekly: When Mirren Aitken, a department store heiress goes missing, Mirren's mother asks well-to-do sleuth Dandy to track her down. Aitkens' Emporium ("Tailors, Mantle Makers, Silk Merchants, Domestic Bazaar") is in bitter competition with another store in the town of Dunfermline, House of Hepburn ("Hosiers, Glovers, Clothiers, and Milliners"). The Aitkens fear that Mirren has eloped with Dugald Hepburn, a scion of the rival family. Before long, Dandy must tackle a related homicide, only to become a suspect herself.

Actually...Mirren is found during the Emporium's fifty anniversary party. And she hasn't eloped. In fact, she's not going anywhere except to a resting place six feet deep. And her intended, Dugald, isn't far behind. And, while Dandy does spend an uncomfortable few hours in the police station answering questions, I can't say she's every seriously suspected. But Dandy does tackle the investigation and, finally--after quite a tangled trail--discovers the truth of the matter.

Count me baffled. I'm baffled about the ending. It has got to be one of the most complicated solutions to a mystery out of all the mysteries I've read. I read the ending a second time because I couldn't wrap my head around it the first time. I'm still not sure I understand all of the family connections going on here. I'm also baffled as to why on earth this won an Agatha award for Best Historical Mystery. I'm baffled about why Dandy is described in a blurb as "an enthralling heroine; part Dorothy Parker (in her dreams), part Miss Marple (Christie's elderly sleuth is about 100 times sharper)" and why we would mention any of this in the same breath as Agatha Christie.

I thought the debut novel (After the Armistice Ball) was a decent first book in the series. And, despite a few misgivings, I thought the third novel (Dandy Gilver & the Proper Treatment of Bloodstains) was a fun book and did the historical side of things well with bonus interesting premise. Unfortunately this one has none of those good points. In fact, the longer I think about it, the more I wonder if the ★★ that I'm assigning isn't a bit generous....

First line: Whatever I was expecting when I decided to take a turn around Dunfermline--I was early for my appointment and it was a particularly pleasant day--it was not this air of jubilance.

Last line: I was very glad indeed that out of everyone around, I was me.
*************************

Deaths = 2 (one shot; one fell from height)

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Girl Waits with Gun


 Girl Waits with Gun
(2015) by Amy Stewart

Based on the forgotten true story of one of the nation's first female crime fighters. Synopsis from the book flap: Constance Kopp doesn't quite fit the mold. She towers over most men, has no interest in marriage or domestic affairs, and has been isolated from the world since a family secret sent her and her sisters from city to country fifteen years ago. When a powerful, ruthless factory owner runs down their buggy, a dispute over damages turns into a war of bricks, bullets, and threats as he unleashes his gang on their farm. The sheriff enlists her help, and it turns out Constance has a knack for outwitting (and disarming) the criminal element which might just take her back out into the world and onto a new path in life. Quick-witted and full of madcap escapades, Girl Waits with Gun is a story about one woman rallying the courage to stand up for and grow into herself--with a little help from sisters and sheriffs along the way....Constance Kopp catapults from forgotten historical anecdote to unforgettable historical fiction heroine--an outsized woman not only ahead of her time, but sometimes even ahead of ours.

My take: Historically important. It was interesting to learn about this woman who became the first ever female sheriff's deputy. But I have to say as a story, it just didn't grab me and I didn't find Constance (or her sisters) interesting characters at all as presented. And I didn't really see the "madcap escapades" anywhere. It was one long parade of harassment by Henry Kaufmann's gang of ruffians. It took quite a long time to get to where he actually is charged with harassment and assault and it sticks. The most interesting part, for me was when Constance shows herself to be a detective-in-the-making and manages to find a lost little boy. The boy was taken from his mother (a woman seduced by Kaufmann, by the way) and sent to an orphanage. It's Constance who puts two and two together and figures out where the boy was taken. Hands down--best part of the book and it didn't even make the book blurb. It's possible, if they feature Constance actually investigating mysteries, that future books may be better...but I'm not sure I'm going to spend time finding out.  ★★ and 1/2

Others on Goodreads seemed to enjoy this more, so your mileage may vary.

First line: Our troubles began in the summer of 1914, the year I turned thirty-five.

Last line: "I'm offering you a job, Miss Kopp."
*********************

Deaths = 2 natural

Monday, August 3, 2026

A Catered Book Club Murder (Spoilerific)


 A Catered Book Club Murder (2021) by Isis Crawford (Barbara Block)

Synopsis (from the book flap): Sisters Bernie and Libby Simmons run a catering business in their upstate New York town and they're delighted for the chance to provide tasty desserts for the local mystery lovers' book club. But when fiction spills into a reality and the sisters find themselves investigating a suspicious death, it's up to them to figure out whodunit...

If anything can be said about the endearingly predictable Margo Hemsley, it's that she always serves elaborate desserts at her mystery book club meetings. That's why everyone fears the worst after she doesn't pick up her order from Bernie and Libby and skips out on the monthly gathering. The Simmons sisters can't imagine their acquaintance vanishing like a character from one of her favorite novels, at least not willingly.

When the search ends with the discovery of a dead body, Bernie and Libby agree to help the nine remaining book club members prove their friend was murdered. But a speed read through Margo's background reveals there was more to the victim than harmless hobbies and frumpy cardigans would suggest. As the sleuthing sisters unearth scandalous secrets about the book club members, they'll have to determine who was connected to Margo's shady dealings--and who sent her to an early grave...

So...I cannot discuss this without spoiling things left, right, and center. You have been warned!

Here we have a "cozy" mystery--amateur sleuths, small town setting, catering with baked goods, and recipes at the end of the book. And the solution is about as cozy as a rabid pit bull whose owner has trained it for dog fights. No, seriously. The solution to this cozy little mystery is a contract killer. What?? I mean, yes, I pointed my finger at the correct suspects (contract killer has a girlfriend...now there's a cozy little novelty)--mainly because contract killer guy kept appearing here and there when the sisters were investigating and the girlfriend kept insisting on how she "tried to warn Margo." I didn't have any real clues to go on. And how we were supposed to figure out that the suspect was a hired gun is beyond me--unless we were just supposed to assume that if a woman had a secret identity all lined up with fake passport and a stash of cash then, of course, somebody would want to hire a killer to do her in.

Another thing that niggles at me--the title centers this on a catered book club murder. The book club really doesn't come into it all. Sure, that's what this group of people have in common--they're all part of the book club. But do we actually see them in the book club? Does the murder happen at a book club meeting?  Do books get more than a passing mention? No, no, and no. For all that the book club figures in, this could have just been focused on any group of friends or neighbors. 

Oh and incidentally, once the culprits are apprehended and the dust settles, life just goes back to normal. All of the book club members were really ticked off at Bernie and Libby during the investigation (because the sisters kept discovering their little secrets and saying that each of the members had motive for murder). But all is apparently forgiven--we change the day the book club meets (to avoid bad vibes??) and change up our pastry order and that's it. We're all friends again. 

Last thing--not important to the mystery, but the recipes at the end of the book? They have no connection to the story whatsoever. I was really hoping for the recipe for the chocolate croissants.

The best part of the plot? Bernie and Libby are the daughters of a former cop, so they immediately turn info over to the police instead of keeping it to themselves. It doesn't keep them from running into trouble with the killers at the end and barely escaping being murdered--but at least it isn't because they haven't kept the authorities up to date on their discoveries. Overall, this wasn't my cup of tea--it didn't help that the book opened by dissing one of my favorite mystery authors of all time, Dorothy L. Sayers. ★★

First line: Lydia Baskerville cleared her throat, "I dreamt about you last night, Margot," she said, her voice loud against the air conditioner.

Last line: It was time to go.
*******************

Deaths = one drowned; one shot


Sunday, August 2, 2026

The Benson Murder Case


 The Benson Murder Case (1926) by S. S. Van Dine

Based very loosely on the (unsolved) true crime murder of  Joseph Brown Elwell in 1920. Elwell, a bridge expert, was found shot to death in his locked home and, like Benson in this novel, was not wearing the toupee which covered his bald head (and his vanity). 

Alvin Benson, a financial man in partnership with his brother Major Anthony Benson, is found shot through the forehead while sitting in his favorite chair in the living room. A book is still clasped in his hand. The house was locked up tight and only Benson and his housekeeper have keys. It's not surprising to find a lady's handbag and gloves on the mantle--Benson was well-known for his pursuit of the fairer sex. So, District Attorney John F. X. Markham naturally assumes it's a case of cherche la femme. But, after examining the room and the dead man, Philo Vance, dilettante and aspiring amateur sleuth, declares that no woman could have committed the crime. He convinces Markham and once the owner of the purse is found the DA decides that her fiance, having taken exception to the attentions of Benson towards his beloved, decided to rid the world of a scoundrel. Vance, of course, shoots that theory down too. Before long, it seems that every viable suspect is ruled out. Could it be that nobody did it?

Once upon a time, I discovered Philo Vance. If I remember correctly, it was in the treasure trove that was the Owen Public Library in my first year of marriage. For a town of about 2500, that library had the most amazing collection of vintage mysteries and it introduced me to the likes of S. S. Van Dine, Elizabeth Daly, Edmund Crispin, and many others that I've since hunted down for my very own vintage mystery library. But back to Vance. I discovered him and loved him and hunted down every one of his cases.

So...I needed a metallic/glittery book for a reading challenge and, having picked this one up in the last year or so, I thought it would fit the bill. Honest to goodness, Vance is the most irr'tatin', wordy fellow ever. Why use one word when you could use a whole paragraph of fancy words with sporadically miss'n letters, dontcha know? Older Bev must have a lot less patience for this type of thing than younger Bev. And Markham must have the patience of Job to put up with this sort of thing on the regular. And what makes it all the worse is that a HUGE portion of the book is devoted to talk--and Vance talking most of the time. There is very little actual action here. It's all Vance giving his ideas about things OR Vance & Markham interviewing suspects. Talk, talk, talk, talk, talk.

SPOILER ahead!!!!!!

What saves the book is the plot. Figuring out who killed Benson and why is pretty interesting. After making Markham listen to him build up plausible cases against everyone who has been on the top of the suspect list, Vance twists everything around to show how someone who hasn't even really been considered and who seems to have the classic iron-clad alibi could have done it. And--by the way--actually did. The mystery is good enough...I just wish I had enjoyed Vance more this time around. ★★

First Line: It happened  that, on the morning of the momentous June the fourteenth when the discovery of the murdered body of Alvin H. Benson created a sensation which, to this day has not entirely died away, I had breakfasted with Philo Vance in his apartment.

He [Vance] spent considerable time at his clubs: his favorite was the Stuyvesant, because, as 

he explained to me, its mentorship was drawn largely from the political and commercial ranks, and he was never drawn into a discussion that required any mental effort (p. 23)

"Y' know, Markham, our so-called civ'lization is nothing more than the persistent destruction of everything that's beautiful and enduring, and the designing of cheap makeshifts....Look at that fine old door, for instance, with its bevelled panels and bolection, and its Ionic pilasters and carved lintel. And then compare it with the flat. flimsy, machine-made, shellacked boards which are turned out by the thousands today." (Vance; p. 265)

Last Line: And the remark, though intended merely as a good-natured sally, proved strangely prophetic.
*****************

Deaths = one shot

Thursday, July 30, 2026

How to Dance with a Duke


 How to Dance with a Duke (2012) by Manda Collins (read by Anne Flosnik)

 From the Goodreads Synopsis: Miss Cecily Hurston would much rather explore the antiquities of Egypt than the uncharted territory of marriage. But the rules of her father's exclusive academic society forbid her entrance unless she weds one of its member. To clear her ailing father of a scandalous rumor, Cecily needs to gain admission into the Egyptian Club--and is willing to marry any old dullard to do it. Lucas Dalton, Duke of Winterson., is anything but dull. He's a dashing and decorated war hero determined to help Cecily--even if that means looking the other way when she claims the dance card of Amelia Snow, this seasons most sough-after beauty. But Lucas has a reason for wanting Cecily to join the Egyptian. His brother went missing during [the last] of Lord Hurston's expeditions to Egypt. An alliance with the explorer's bluestocking daughter could bring Lucas closer to the truth about what happened...or it could lead him to a more dangerous love than either he or Cecily could have imagined.

After thoroughly enjoying Collins' Ladies Most Scandalous series (and needing another book by her for a challenge), I decided to try one of her earlier works. A number of things have come together to make this a far less satisfying read/listen.

1. The narrator is far less engaging than the one who performs the more recent series. She seems to be trying to keep a damper on any emotion or inflection--especially in the early chapters--and reads the words as if speaking to people who are rather slow on the uptake....and....who...need...a...lot...of...time to process everything. I've never upped the reading speed on an audio novel before but had to do so to help get through this at a reasonable pace and to keep my attention.

2. While the synopsis interested me greatly when I was scanning library entries for Collins' books, it just didn't grab me in the way her Ladies Most Scandalous series did. I think she has grown exponentially as a writer and has become much more adept at combining the romance and mystery aspects. 

3. Speaking of mystery aspects, this one is much weaker. As soon as the culprit appears on the scene, it was obvious to me that they were responsible. There really weren't a lot of viable options for other culprits and the biggest mystery to me was why Lucas and Cecily were still in the dark until the very end of the story.

4. Speaking of the romance aspect, as another reviewer on Goodreads noted: one of the spicy scenes was totally inappropriate--not as a spicy scene in and of itself, but because why on earth when you've been eavesdropping on potential bad guys and find yourselves locked in a room would you suddenly think this is the time and place to indulge your spicy nature??? Seriously?

5. Opening interaction between Lucas and Cecily was pretty stupid. First he chases her down the street, she's trying to avoid him. Then when she finds out he's the brother of her father's secretary (who's missing, by the way), she suddenly wants to talk to him. When she suddenly wants to talk to him, he thinks it's because of her avarice and his title (because of course if a female actually wants to talk to him, then she must be scheming to marry him now that he's a duke and all) and he tries to skedaddle. She chases him. Another stupid scene and she leaves in a huff. This time he lets her go--only to regret having done after the fact. AND supposedly she doesn't want to create a scene on the public street. What on earth does she think all that to-ing and fro-ing was doing?

6. It seems to me that Collins has a much better grasp of the historical time period in the more recent series as well. I never really felt like I was in the regency period here--even though all the trappings were present and there were mentions of Prinny and Napoleon. 

Good points:

1. Great premise. Love the idea of a mystery connected to an Egyptian expedition.

2. Love, love, love both the Duke's mother and Cecily's step-mother. It's nice to see story where the step-mother is not the evil stereotype. Other great characters include Cecily's cousins.

3. The promise of stories about the cousins actually made me want to continue with the series. 

I believe this may be Collins' debut novel and as such it is fairly solid with a great premise that just needed better follow through. But as mentioned, her later work is much more accomplished and better plotted from (my main interest) the mystery standpoint. If I go on to others in this series (Ugly Ducklings), I hope to find that they grow stronger as well. ★★ and 1/2 

First line: Miss Cecily Hurston batted her ivory tipped parasol against the hulking footman who none too gently thrust her through the doors of number thirteen Broughton Street.

Last line: Her reply, though enthusiastic, was unintelligible.
*******************

Deaths = 2 (one hit on head; one poisoned) 


Tuesday, July 28, 2026

A Governess's Guide to Passion & Peril

  A Governess's Guide to Passion & Peril (2024) by Manda Collins (read by Mary Jane Wells)

After Jane Halliwell's father killed himself and bankruptcy from gambling debts was found to be the reason, she and her mother were shunned by their former "friends" connected to the Foreign Office (where Halliwell had worked) as well as by the echelons of polite society. Jane's mother went to live with a cousin in Scotland and Jane was forced to support herself through governess positions. After being dismissed without a character from one post (because the man of the house couldn't keep himself to himself--and naturally she was blamed), one of her father's few remaining friends, Lord Guilford gives her a post as governess to his daughter Margaret (Meg). But his wife is none too pleased because she is friends of the woman who dismissed Jane and makes Jane's life miserable. She frequently reminds her to keep her place and not to "cast lures" at any gentlemen in the house if she doesn't want to cast out again.

Lord Guilford, a noted fancier of roses, is hosting a conference on rose gardening...which is totally not about roses. It's just a cover for a little diplomatic get-together in which England and other countries will be trying to convince a tiny little east European country (for which, read fictional) to sell its plans for a "long-distance talking device" to their governments. Guilford's right-hand man for this event is Lord Adrian Fielding who knew Jane and her family in Rome (Halliwell's last posting) and who...in Jane's mind...walked away from them* when they needed friends the most. And he's the last person that Jane wants to see. (*Jane didn't know that he'd received his own marching orders from the Foreign Office and had no time to say goodbye.) 

But fate has a way with things. When a woman cancels at the last moment, Lady Guilford asks Jane to attend the conference dinner to balance the numbers (heaven forbid that there be more gentleman than ladies...or vice versa). And so she comes face-to-face with the man she worshipped from afar (she was in her late teens when he was a twenty-something low-ranking official with the Foreign Office in Rome). And--as these things go--of course, they both are immediately drawn to each other while firmly denying any interest whatsoever....

When the ladies leave the gentlemen to their port, Lady Guilford sends Jane off to retrieve a shawl she left in Guilford's study. Jane finds not only the missing shawl, but the dead body of her employer. Lord Guilford has been stabbed. Did one of the rival diplomats take exception to England's leading position in the race for the new invention? Was there a personal grudge? When a page from Machiavelli--with an underlined quote--and a pressed rose are found in the dead man's pocket, Jane, Lord Adrian, and Inspector Eversham (who is called in on the case) realize that maybe someone is targeting men in the Foreign Office....and maybe Halliwell's death wasn't a suicide after all. A few other suspicion FO deaths are discovered and now the trio are in a race to uncover the villain behind the deaths before he can strike again.

If the previous "Ladies Most Scandalous" book was a nicely done, more fairly clued mystery in the classic style, then this one adds a bit of spymaster spice. We've got the elements of the Foreign Office thrown in so we're not sure whether the motive is more prosaic (personal gain, jealousy, etc) or exotic (national secrets, experimental devices, etc). It mixes things up nicely and I enjoy watching Collins try her hand at various mystery genres. My one complaint is how formulaic the romances are becoming--two people who claim to have no interest in one another now (whether they've just met or had reason to be friendly in the past) and all and sundry can see the obvious sparks between them and then suddenly they realize that they are mad for each other (and wind up having sexy scenes after like two kisses--and in the middle of a murder investigation, no less). But...it's fiction after all and I do like the romantic fluff in general, especially since it's tied to some pretty good mysteries. ★★★★

Oh...and I meant to mention this in the previous audio version reviews I did: Mary Jane Wells does an absolutely fabulous job with the narration and handling the various voices for all the characters. I thoroughly enjoy her interpretations of these people and especially how she is able to carry forward the intonations and vocal qualities she's given to characters who recur from story to story. 

First line: "Margaret, do stop staring out the window and pay attention to your geography lesson please."

Last line: "I love you more," Adrian said, framing her face in his hands and with the gentle sound of water lapping at the sides of the boat, he kissed her.
******************

Deaths =  7 (two carriage accident; two stabbed; two shot; one poisoned)

A Dying Fall


 A Dying Fall (1973) by Hildegarde Dolson

Grace Dilworth's family has always made their mark on the community of Wingate, Connecticut. Her father, the wealthiest man in town, had had fingers in nearly all the pies and when he died, part of his legacy was the Dilworth Arts and Crafts Center. It's a place for community artists of all sorts to ply their craft and exhibit their work. It's known beyond the town's borders for the beautiful rose garden. It's a place the town is proud of. Now Grace, his heir, is making her own mark...but it's not nearly as well received.

Grace returns home after a long cruise with the handsome Davin Lowry on her arm and starts dropping bombshells. The smallest is that they're engaged. And the biggest? Well--first of all, the beautiful rose garden is history. Davin is supposedly an art expert and he's had the brilliant idea to dig up the roses and replace it all with an avant-garde sculpture garden. The board of directors are dismayed--but Grace has the controlling interest and what she says goes. And Mario, the gardener who has cared for those roses like their his own children, is incensed.

The first of the sculptures arrive--among them a ten-foot steel piece with sharp, sword-like prongs sticking out of it titled of all things "Touch Therapy." Well...somebody uses it as therapy all right to get Davin Lowry out of their system for good. The young man's body is discovered impaled on one of the protruding prongs.

Lucy Ramsdale, the sixtyish amateur snoo---er, sleuth, and Inspector James McDougal are off on another hunt for a murderer in this second of the four-part series. Lucy can't believe that one of her neighbors could be responsible. McDougal is sure that Alec, the assistant director for the center, was afraid Gavin planned to see him thrown out of the place just as effectively as the roses (Lucy thinks McDougal is letting his prejudices run away with him). But the evidence points to Mario, the gardener. And Sergeant Terrizi, who is engaged to Mario's niece, is under family pressure to prove Uncle Mario's innocence. Terrizi actually thinks that there was trouble in paradise and that Grace did away with her betrothed herself. Are any of them right? 

At the end of the first book, I had high hopes for McDougal--he'd become a more interesting and likeable character by the end and I thought that would continue. Nah. He's back to grousing over his failed marriage and feeling sorry for himself that he isn't really connected to the police any more. It's amazing how he keeps getting to lead investigations when he's officially retired... Why doesn't the man apply to the local force for a job? And Lucy is also a bit more annoying. She keeps getting her feathers ruffled over how McDougal is investigating and not reacting exactly as she wants him to. Yes, she's a rather egocentric person, but I don't remember it being quite such a thing last time.

The mystery is okay--I mean, there aren't many suspects to begin with and when the killer starts knocking off others who may have been witnesses of one sort or another then the number shrinks even more. It would have also been nice if a little more foundation had been laid for the killer's extreme response to a certain piece of information. It felt like it came out of the blue. I do have one more in the series (the third)--I hope it is stronger than this one. ★★ and 1/2

First line: As Lucy Ramsdale said when the news reached her, "If Grace's papa could hear this, he wouldn't turn over in his grave--he would levitate."

Last line: The nurse who had come in to pick up the dinner tray was shocked.
****************

Deaths = 3 (one stabbed; one fell from height; one hit on head)

Sunday, July 26, 2026

A Spinster's Guide to Danger & Dukes


  A Spinster's Guide to Danger & Dukes
(2023) by Manda Collins (read by Mary Jane Wells)

Miss Poppy Delamare has been living in London under the name Flora Deaver. As such, she has been working as the secretary to Lady Katherine Eversham and as a reporter for Kate's newspaper. She had fled to the city to escape an unwanted marriage arranged by her odious stepfather--to his equally odious secretary. But when she sees a newspaper article stating that her half-sister stands accused of murdering her husband--the same odious secretary, she knows she must rush home to do whatever she can to clear her sister's name. She knows that Violet could never have killed the man--not just because she's her sister, but because he was shoved off the top of a tower and Violet is terrified of heights.

Poppy leaves a hurried note for Kate (who is a friend as well as employer) and Caro (recently wed to her Viscount) and makes a beeline for the train station where she is promptly relieved of her life's savings by a cut-purse. She runs after the man, shouting "Stop, thief!" and runs smack into Joshua Fielding, the Duke of Langham. The two have already met in the previous novel and were not exactly enamoured of each other. But Langham is a gentleman and can't leave a lady in need. When he discovers that she is headed to the same village as he (its conveniently home to his country estate) and why, he proposes a deal. He'll use his ducal influence in every way possible to assist her quest for justice and she will accompany him to the estate--as his fiancee! 

You see, Langham is due home for his grandmother's birthday party, an annual gala which the matriarch uses as an attempt to see her grandson hooked up with a suitable woman to become the duchess. He just knows there will be a harem of women for him to look over and he has absolutely no intention of marrying any of them. If Poppy will agree to a faux engagement for the duration, it will save him no end of bother and if she's appearing as his fiancee, there will be even more reason for his ducal protection. The uneasy bargain is struck and the two of them give the house party the shock of season when they step off the train and Langham makes the introductions.

Poppy faces fire from the society ladies whose noses have been put out of joint, but, fortunately, she was gently bred before leaving home and has the manners and courage to face things out. She even, after a rather stiff introduction, manages to win over the Dowager Duchess and Langham's two sisters. Poppy begins to feel bad about the deception, but once started she knows she has to go on with it if she's to have any chance of saving Violet. 

And...what about that murder? Well, it winds up that there is dirty work afoot between the dead man and his boss. They've been swindling people and a note that Lanham and Poppy find while investigating seems to indicate that the victim had been blackmailing various people as well. Was there a falling out between the thieves? Did one of his victims decide to eliminate the blackmailer? Or...there's an indication that there may have been an attachment between Violet and Langham's cousin & steward. Is the murderer closer to Langham than Poppy? 

Meanwhile, as Langham and Poppy work together to fool the house guests as well as play detective, they find themselves wishing more and more that the engagement wasn't fake....

So, the next audiobook in this series begins by telling us that these are romance novels with mystery thrown in. Perhaps--there is quite a bit of romance going on here and, of course, as happens when two people who dislike each other on sight are thrown into a faux engagement/relationship for one reason or another, they naturally wind up madly in love. But--this particular installment in the series has a quite respectable mystery in it. Very nicely clued and if I had thought just a little bit harder about the first one presented I could have figured out who the culprit was. As it happened, I didn't and went haring off after a red herring. And the romance is quite good as well--I really like Langham and Poppy. Especially Poppy. I loved how she stood up to the society women who were determined to put her in her place (without success). The scene in the tower (when they get locked in) seemed a bit rushed and forced for where the relationship was, but otherwise the progression of their relationship was handled well. I'm looking forward to finishing the next installment. ★★★★

First line: Violence regrettably was out of the question.

Last line: "You make a good point," she said as he took her mouth, and it was quite a long while before they spoke again.
********************

Deaths = one stabbed


Murder at the Royal Albert Hall


 Murder at the Royal Albert Hall (2021) by Lee Strauss (read by Elizabeth Klett)

August 1926. A night of operatic culture and a matrimonial triumph for Felicia Gold turns into tragedy. Ginger Reed and her family--husband Inspector Basil Reed, Grandmother Ambrosia & sister-in-law Felicia (by Ginger's previous marriage), and Felicia's beau Charles, Lord Davenport-Witt--are out for night at the opera. An event prompted by a note the Dowager Lady Gold received from two old friends from finishing school days. Ambrosia agreed to come and meet them at the interval, but insisted on sitting with her family. Before the curtain rises, Charles takes center stage and publicly proposes to Felicia (delighting the young woman who loves to be the focus of attention).

But her delight turns to horror later in the evening when the Duchess of Worthington, another of Ambrosia's former friends, falls from the balcony and dies. What initially looks like accident is soon proves to be murder. When the Duke of Worthington is also killed, it seems that somebody is working out a grudge. And when Basil and Ginger try to question Ambrosia and the remainder of the "sisterhood"--just to get background on the Worthingtons, none of the ladies want to talk. Could it be that secrets of the past are just now taking their toll? And what could possibly have happened now that murder seems like the only answer? Ambrosia's diary from those years may hold some clues, but will she be willing to share it before more murders take place?

This is an interesting twist in the Ginger Gold mysteries. Through Ambrosia's diary entries, we get a glimpse of what the Dowager Duchess was as a young girl (and we see shades of both Felicia and Ginger's personalities there--even though Ginger isn't blood related). We also get a more solid mystery with clues. If the solution had rested entirely on the clues given, I would have raised my rating even more but, alas, there isn't any way that I can see (well--hear, since I listened to the audio version) that the reader could have figured out the complete motive. I suspected the right culprit--but more from context than from clues to motive. I will concede that it's possible I missed the clues. It's more difficult for me to pick them up and track them when listening rather than reading with my eyes. But I don't think I did. I'm also not sure how to interpret that last line...I'm hoping that what I think might be in store is a figment of my imagination. ★★★★

First line: The anticipation surrounding the opera at the Royal Albert Hall was palpable.

Last lines: Ginger sighed. She would make a truce with Charles that their past wouldn't come to haunt them. Would it?
*********************

Deaths = 4 (two stabbed; two poisoned)