One man stands for the old ideology, the other for the new ideals. But as we follow the trial and watch the relationship between the two antagonists we begin to wonder at the differences between the two. At one point Solinsky considers the way ideals change...or at least how we view them changes. "A loyal Communist becomes a Trotskyist terrorist and then a loyal Communist again. Heroes become traitors and traitors become martyrs. Inspirational leaders and helmsmen of the nation become common criminals with their hands in the cashbox--until, perhaps, at some dread moment in the future, they become charming nonagenarians on TV chat shows." And, in the end, are the methods that Solinsky uses to gain the conviction he seeks any better than the methods of the man he has brought to trial?
This is a powerful and unsettling book. A novel about the fall of Communism and, yet, the hold it retains on its successors. It is about the uncertain politics of that time and the disturbingly grey areas hidden in any of the black and white visions held about the world. A well-written novel about a difficult political time. Three and a half stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Sorry folks, but I have been getting an incredible amount of spam. I have adjusted my settings and all messages will be moderated from now on. If that does not take care of the problem then I will have to go to the "Prove You're Not a Robot" thing--which I hate as much as you do.
If your name does not appear automatically, please tell me your name in the comment. Otherwise you will just show up as "Unknown." Thanks!