Pages

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Jerusalem Inn: Review

Jerusalem Inn is one of Martha Grimes' earlier Richard Jury mysteries that I somehow missed when I was on my Grimes reading jag back in the 80s. The earlier mysteries are much more my style--more typical, straight-forward detective story than some of her later work. This one involves Richard Jury and his sidekick Melrose Plant in a couple of Christmas-time murders. A chance encounter in a graveyard finds Jury meeting Helen Minton--a beautiful woman who Jury immediately takes a liking to. He is on his way to his cousin's for the Christmas holidays (not a visit he's particularly looking forward to) and arranges to stop by one day and have dinner when Helen. However, the next time he sees her, she's in no condition to appreciate a meal. She's dead. Her death might have been taken for natural causes if not for two things--her body was found in the Old Hall where she had been showing visitors around and Jury arriving on the spot. An autopsy reveals poison.

Meanwhile, Melrose Plant and his entourage of Ruthven, his butler, his Aunt Agatha, and Vivian Rivington have been invited to a house party in the area. While there, Melrose and a young Marquess stumble over the body of another woman. This time there is no doubt as to the cause of death...a bullet hole through the ermine coat she was wearing bears witness. Jury soon becomes involved in both murders as he finds that there are those in the house party who knew both women. But is there a single motive for the removal of the two? Jury and Plant each talk with the suspects and soon Jury is given the answer....in the form of a doll who has been requisitioned to play the part of baby Jesus in the local pub's nativity scene.


What I like most about the Richard Jury stories is the characters. Jury and Plant and all the recurring characters are great fun and I have enjoyed getting to know them through the series. This one is particularly good in the scenes where Jury is interacting with children. He treats them just right. Where I find Grimes lacking is in her wrap-up. Even though you know who and why at the end...there is still a feeling that you've been left dangling. That's why I'm giving this one three and a half stars instead of four.

5 comments:

  1. Bev, I'm thinking of rereading some of the early Richard Jury books. It's been so long since I read that I absolutely do not remember much about them except that I loved most of them. My favorite is still THE OLD SILENT. But you're right about Grimes and her 'wrap-ups' she does leave a lot dangling. I think she means to. But it is often unsettling.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Remember when she left Jury shot for dead (the only witness, a little dog) at the end of the book and you had to wait another whole year to find out if he survived. She is a wicked, wicked woman. Ha!

    And some of her crimes can be particularly heartbreaking and gruesome.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I do remember the one with Jury shot. And you're right about some of the crimes. If I hadn't gotten hooked on her characters, I'm sure I would never have kept reading the series.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just taking this one off the shelf now. It is pushing 100 degrees here and I need a book with snow in it! - Rick

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yeah, it's been pretty toasty here too--but it's raining right now, so maybe that will help.

    ReplyDelete

Sorry folks, but I have been getting an incredible amount of spam. I have adjusted my settings and all messages will be moderated from now on. If that does not take care of the problem then I will have to go to the "Prove You're Not a Robot" thing--which I hate as much as you do.

If your name does not appear automatically, please tell me your name in the comment. Otherwise you will just show up as "Unknown." Thanks!